Talk:Shamanistic Wicca
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    |
This article is part of WikiProject Neopaganism, a WikiProject dedicated to expanding, organizing, verifying, and NPOVing articles related to neopagan religions. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
 |
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. | |
It seems some sources have been added to this, but from what I can see here, most of the "sources" don't support the statements they're footnoted to. A footnote will link to a definition of "shaman", but have no information that the group mentioned actually meets those criteria. Or the footnote will be supposed to document the role of a group as "a main branch" of this tradition, but the book in the footnote was written decades before the group in question. I will try to improve this, but I am sceptical of how much it can be helped. Valhallaiac 16:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
There is nothing in here about Wicca. Or, nothing that is sourced. If the material that's been waiting on legitimate footnotes since March is removed, this will have nothing that can't be merged into the Neoshamanism or Core Shamanism articles. I'll wait and see if anyone sources it, but otherwise I think we're looking at merging and redirecting. Valhallaiac 17:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- This page has just come to my notice because someone has linked to it from here. I agree, this article says nothing about Wicca that can be sourced and a merge to one of those two articles would be appropriate. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 14:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Related I do not know how much help I can be but I will see what I can do. As to time, it is busy season at work please be patient.--Chad Joseph Wilson (talk) 10:16, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
