Talk:Shaiva Siddhanta
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saivism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Saivism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Hinduism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
|
| ??? | This article has not been rated yet on the quality scale. |
I've organized the ideas into sections, to see if that helps. Somebody please add a table of contents. If the edit does not make sense, try to reorganize until it does.
[edit] Request for help in identifying forking
I have been looking at the complex of articles Shiva, Rudra, Shaivism, History of Shaivism, Six Schools of Shaivism, Shaiva Siddhanta, Kaśmir Śaivism etc., and see quite a bit of forking and overlap. It would be great if as many editors as possible could watchlist all of these articles and help out with an effort to figure out what should go where. Sharing effort across multiple articles may help with sourcing for all of them. Buddhipriya 22:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Bias
"Most vigorously practiced Shaivite Hindu group?" How can that ever be measured or known?--ॐJesucristo301 16:37, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
This article is biased in that it is slanted towards the view of a small minority of shaivas. The Shaiva Siddhanta tradition in India is known for and overwhelmingly dualistic (mono-theistic), as opposed to Kashmir Shaisvism which is nondualistic (monist). Yet by reading this article a person would come away believing that "real" Shaiva Siddhanta is monist like the Kashmiri school. I assume this is due to the followers of the Saiva Siddhanta Church, who are a small sect of Shaivas who like to teach that their type of Shaiva Siddhanta (the monist variety) represents Shaivism within the Hindu world (see this article in their newspaper "Hinduism Today" http://www.hinduismtoday.com/archives/2003/10-12/44-49_four_sects.shtml Go down to the section titled 'On the Soul and God' where you will see this
"Saivism: God Siva is one with the soul. The soul must realize this advaitic (monistic) Truth by God Siva's grace.
Shaktism: The Divine Mother, Shakti, is mediatrix, bestowing advaitic moksha on those who worship Her.
Vaishnavism: God and soul are eternally distinct. Through Lord Vishnu's grace, the soul's destiny is to worship and enjoy God.
Smartism: Ishvara and man are in reality Absolute Brahman. Within maya, the soul and Ishvara appear as two. Jnana (wisdom) dispels the illusion."
Not only is the description of Saivism giving the minority view (since most Shaivas belong to the non-monist traditions), also the description of the Smarta tradition is biased (While most smartas believe in monist philosophy it is not what makes a smarta a smarta, many are not monists, a smarta can have any vedic philosophical belief and still be a smarta)
One example of the general bias of this article is this section:
"A dualistic development
In the thirteenth century, another important development occurred in Shaiva Siddhanta when Meykandar wrote the twelve-verse Sivajñanabodham. This and subsequent works by other writers laid the foundation of the Meykandar Sampradaya, which propounds a pluralistic realism wherein God, souls and world are coexistent and without beginning. Siva is efficient but not material cause. They view the soul’s merging in Siva as salt in water, an eternal oneness that is also twoness. This school’s literature has so dominated scholarship that Shaiva Siddhanta is often erroneously identified as exclusively pluralistic. In truth, there are two interpretations, one monistic and another dualistic, of which the former is the original philosophical premise found in pre-Meykandar scriptures, including the Upanishads."
The entire article is twisted to promote the views of a minority as being the real true form of the religion while relegating the larger tradition as some new form which is not in line with the Upanishads! Essentially that paragraph is saying the main tradition is bogus, since the Upanishads are revealed scripture in Hinduism, and that the minority monist sect is the true religion!
Here is how Shaiva Siddhanta philosophy is usually described
http://www.saivism.net/sects/siddha/siddhasaivism.asp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Shaivism
Shiva das 20:53, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- This is not a page on shaivism but about the this particular school of shaivism.so obviously it is not intended to represent the "majority view" as u put it.In the very beginning of the article it is expictly stated that it is one form of shaivite hinudism although the oldest and extensively warrants ciations -which are not provided-it is obvious it is not the only school of thought.It would most kind of you if you can add content to the page . Manquer (talk) 16:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
