Talk:Shahzada (Guantanamo captive 952)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

	Shahzada (Guantanamo captive 952) is part of the WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{npov}} tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption

Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{npov}} tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption. Geo Swan 12:58, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] clarification please?

I asked for clarification of the placement of an {{unreferenced}} tag on this article on the talk page of the wikipedian who placed it.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 13:26, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

I have answered your post on my talk page. What I meant was that the section is filled with statements that take a particular point of view but are not footnoted so the reader does not know where to look to verify whether these statements are true or not, per WP:V and WP:RS. Also, you need unbiased multiple sources for controversial statements. An encyclopedia should not depend on one source for information in an article. I changed the template to, hopefully, more correctly reflect my concerns. Regards, Mattisse 15:03, 4 February 2008 (UTC)