Shape analysis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article describes shape analysis to analyze and process geometric shapes. For shape analysis in the field of code analysis refer to Shape analysis (software). The shape analysis described here is related to the statistical analysis of geometric shapes, to shape matching and shape recognition. It applies purely to the geometry of an object, not to the structural analysis that deals with predicted behaviour of mechanical parts.

Contents 1 What is shape analysis? 2 Application fields 3 Shape descriptors 4 See also 5 External links 6 References

[edit] What is shape analysis?

Shape analysis is the mainly automatic analysis of geometric shapes, for example using a computer to detect similarly shaped objects in a database or parts that fit together. For a computer to automatically analyze and process geometric shapes, the objects have to be represented in a digital form. Most commonly a boundary representation is used to describe the object with its boundary (usually the outer shell, see also 3D model). However, other volume based representations (e.g. constructive solid geometry) or point based representations (point clouds) can be used to represent shape.

Once the objects are given, either by modeling (computer-aided design), by scanning (3D scanner) or by extracting shape from 2D or 3D images, they have to be simplified before a comparison can be achieved. The simplified representation is often called a shape descriptor (or fingerprint, signature). These simplified representations try to carry most of the important information, while being easier to handle, to store and to compare than the shapes directly. A complete shape descriptor is a representation that can be used to completely reconstruct the original object (for example the medial axis transform).

[edit] Application fields

Shape analysis is used in may application fields:

• archeology for example, to find similar objects or missing parts
• architecture for example, to identify objects that spatially fit into a specific space
• medical imaging to understand shape changes related to illness or aid surgical planning
• virtual environments or on the 3D model market to identify objects for copyright purposes
• security applications such as face recognition
• entertainment industry (movies, games) to construct and process geometric models or animations
• computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing to process and to compare designs of mechanical parts or design objects.

[edit] Shape descriptors

Shape descriptors can be classified by their invariance with respect to the transformations allowed in the associated shape definition. Many descriptors are invariant with respect to congruency, meaning that congruent shapes (shapes that could be translated, rotated and mirrored) will have the same descriptor (for example moment or spherical harmonic based descriptors or Procrustes analysis operating on point clouds).

Another class of shape descriptors (called intrinsic shape descriptors) is invariant with respect to isometry. These descriptors do not change with different isometric embeddings of the shape. Their advantage is that they can be applied nicely to deformable objects (e.g. a person in different body postures) as these deformations do not involve much stretching but are in fact near-isometric. Such descriptors are commonly based on geodesic distances measures along the surface of an object or on other isometry invariant characteristics such as the Laplace-Beltrami spectrum.

There are other shape descriptors, such as graph-based descriptors like the medial axis or the Reeb graph that capture geometric and/or topological information and simplify the shape representation but can not be as easily compared as descriptors that represent shape as a vector of numbers.

From this discussion it becomes clear, that different shape descriptors target different aspects of shape and can be used for a specific application. Therefore, depending on the application, it is necessary to analyze how well a descriptor captures the features of interest.

[edit] See also

• List of geometric shapes
• Discrete Morse theory
• Discrete differential geometry
• Topological data analysis

[edit] External links

• The Aim at Shape Project
• The Princeton Shape Benchmark
• Rotation Invariant Spherical Harmonic Representation of 3D Shape Descriptors
• Shape Analysis using the Laplace-Beltrami spectrum
• Intrinsic Shape comparison using the Gromov-Hausdorff Distance
• Shape analysis survey

[edit] References

• Leila de Floriani, Michela Spagnuolo (2007). Shape Analysis and Structuring. Springer. 978-3540332640. 
• Michel C. Delfour, J. P. Zolésio (2001). Shapes and Geometries: Analysis, Differential Calculus, and Optimization. SIAM. ISBN 978-0898714890.