Shame society
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A shame society is one in which the primary device for gaining control over children and maintaining control over adults is the inculcation of shame and the complementary threat of ostracism. A shame society is to be distinguished from a guilt society in which control is maintained by creating and continually reinforcing the feeling of guilt (and the expectation of punishment now or in the hereafter) for certain condemned behaviors. Recently this distinction has been criticized as nothing more than a semantic existentialism.[citation needed]
Contents |
[edit] Desi
The Indian/Desi society enforces social coherence thorough the notion of shame (lajja, as it is known in many Indo-Aryan languages). This worldview appears also among the Romani people, from Diaspora. Although living as local minorities in mostly Abrahamic societies, among Roma it is important the concept of lajav ("shame"), while the concept of bezax ("sin") does not have such significance[1].
[edit] Japan
The society of traditional Japan was long held to be a good example of one in which shame is the primary agent of social control. (Ancient Greece has also been described as a shame society.) The first book to cogently explain the workings of the Japanese society for the Western reader is The Chrysanthemum and the Sword. This book was produced under less than ideal circumstances since it was written during the early years of World War II in an attempt to understand the people who had become such a powerful enemy of the West. Under the conditions of war it was, of course, impossible to do field research in Japan. Nevertheless, depending on the study of members of that culture who were available for interview and study in the West, namely war prisoners at detention centers, as well as literary and other such records pertaining to cultural features, Ruth Benedict drew what some regard as a clear picture of the basic workings of Japanese society. Her study has been challenged and is not relied upon by anthropologists of Japan today, but one that has stood the test of time as an inspiration and starting point still useful for many purposes.
[edit] Western society
Contemporary Western society uses shame as one modality of control, but its primary dependence rests on guilt, and, when that does not work, on the "criminal justice system."
Paul Hiebert characterizes the shame society as follows;
- Shame is a reaction to other people's criticism, an acute personal chagrin at our failure to live up to our obligations and the expectations others have of us. In true shame oriented cultures, every person has a place and a duty in the society. One maintains self-respect, not by choosing what is good rather than what is evil, but by choosing what is expected of one. Personal desires are sunk in the collective expectation. Those who fail will often turn their aggression against themselves instead of using violence against others. By punishing themselves they maintain their self-respect before others, for shame cannot be relieved, as guilt can be, by confession and atonement. Shame is removed and honor restored only when a person does what the society expects of him or her in the situation, including committing suicide if necessary. (Hiebert 1985, 212)
[edit] References
- ^ Delia Grigore, Rromanipen-ul (rromani dharma) şi mistica familiei "Rromanipen (Rromani Dharma) and the Family Mystics" (2001, Salvaţi copiii, Bucharest)
- Ruth Benedict, The Chrysanthemum and the Sword, 1946.
- Hiebert, Paul G., Anthropological Insights for Missionaries, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1985
- Christopher Shannon, "A World Made Safe for Differences: Ruth Benedict's The Chrysanthemum and the Sword," American Quarterly 47 (1995): 659-680.
