User talk:Sevenneed

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "No direct, convincing proof of sock puppetry. And more importantly I merely added 'misleading', 'incomplete', 'neutral' to the section and hope that a more balanced viewpoint can be presented. See the TALK page of Wi-Fi. I thought Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral and complete?? If parents were to read and believe every single sentence under 'Question of Health Risk' and thereafter be convinced that Wi-Fi is totally harmless to their children who may be using Wi-Fi for several hours a day, they may later live to regret when research proves otherwise in future. Just like what happened to Asbestos and Smoking. History has taught us to always adopt a precautionary approach. And Wikipedia will have to explain to these parents why its articles have not been more complete and unbiased!"

Decline reason: "Socckpuppet or not (and that's a pretty dubious "or not", you edited disruptively and fail to assume good faith when you assume all reversions of this article are done by telecommunications industry lobbyists. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.