Settler colonialism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 This article or section is missing citations or needs footnotes.
Using inline citations helps guard against copyright violations and factual inaccuracies. (May 2008)
This map of the world in 1898 shows the large colonial empires that European nations established in the Americas, Africa, Asia, and the South Pacific
This map of the world in 1898 shows the large colonial empires that European nations established in the Americas, Africa, Asia, and the South Pacific
“ Settler population in colonized space are the owners and residents of colonized territory[1] ”

Settler colonialism, is a policy of conquering a distant land to send settlers in order to shape its demographic similarly as in the metropole. This practice contrasts with exploitation colonialism, a policy of conquering distant lands not with the intention to supplant its population, but rather to exploit its natural and human resources. A motherland might pursue the first goal in order to lighten the pressure its growing population apply to its home soil, and shape other parts of the world according to its image, thus extending its territorial continuity and preserving it indefinitely. The reasons that push a country to choose the second option are to attain more immediate benefits, extracting cheap raw materials and enslaving directly or indirectly its inhabitants.

Imperialist powers may opt for one actitude or the other, or both at the same time. Perhaps the most clear example of this difference is the British Empire, whose white population settled mainly North America and Oceania exterminating in the process the native population and building modern infrastructures, and disregarded the Indian subcontinent and Africa, already densely populated. Those areas, instead, were ruled by a small colonial population, and their economies were oriented exclusively around agriculture and extraction aimed at the export to England.

Contents

[edit] Who are the settlers?

Mostly Europeans in origin, the settlers are those who travelled from European nation-states to newly-found territories with the aim of living there permanently, creating a society similar to the one they left. Many of these countries gained greatly from their colonised territories, examples of this are the apexes of the British and the Spanish empire. While some territories gained independence and the indigenous people gained some freedoms, rarely did those liberties reach the point in which a full participation in important affairs was possible. The settlers came from the following countries:

Map of the first (light blue) and second (dark blue — plain and hachured) French colonial empires
Map of the first (light blue) and second (dark blue — plain and hachured) French colonial empires
Territories in the Americas colonized by a European great power in 1750.
Territories in the Americas colonized by a European great power in 1750.

While some of these countries still have control over their colonial settlements, many of the territories that were once subject to the power of some other nation have now gained de jure independence. In spite of this, it might be argued that de facto independence is yet to be achieved, as ties of dependence are yet to be severed. In other cases, while those independent territories are not subject to external influence to the extent that they were before, the population of those territories still experiences considerable turmoil derived from economical disparity (see Gini coefficient) and poor living conditions derived from the past rule of a colonial power, population explosion and rampant corruption.

[edit] Racism and settler colonialism

Racism often pervaded the settlers of new territories, which in many cases resulted in the destruction, or in the best cases, complete assimilation, of the culture of the original inhabitants of the original peoples of the colonised territories.

See also: Casta, White Australia policy, Apartheid

[edit] Settler colonialism in Africa

Due to the cohesive and integrated character of white settlers in countries such as South Africa and Rhodesia, a new and complicated set of conditions that lead to exploitation of the indigenous people by the white minority was created. The elite of the country controls almost all (if not all) the relevant aspects of the political and economical life of the country. The most evident result of this domination was the Apartheid.

[edit] Settler colonialism in Oceania

Australia is a settler society. Europeans came and settled in Australia, in many cases displacing Indigenous Australians. The Indigenous Australian population, estimated at about 350,000 at the time of European settlement,[2] declined steeply for 150 years following settlement, mainly because of infectious disease combined with forced re-settlement and cultural disintegration. The removal of children, that some historians and Indigenous Australians have argued could be considered to constitute genocide by some definitions,[3] may have made a contribution to the decline in the indigenous population. Such interpretations of Aboriginal history are disputed by some as being exaggerated or fabricated for political or ideological reasons.[4] This debate is known within Australia as the History Wars. Following the 1967 referendum, the Federal government gained the power to implement policies and make laws with respect to Aborigines. Traditional ownership of land — native title — was not recognised until 1992, when the High Court case Mabo v Queensland (No 2) overturned the notion of Australia as terra nullius at the time of European occupation.

See also: White Australia policy

[edit] Settler colonialism in Israel

Several scholars have argued that Israeli Settlements (especially those which are hotly disputed) are, in fact, an instance of settler colonialism. Lorenzo Veracini, an Australian scholar from the National University in Canberra argues that Israel could celebrate its anti-colonial and anti-British struggle exactly because it was able to establish a number of colonial relationships within and without the borders of 1948[5].

This is so even when the possibility of an Israeli disengagement is always latent and hence could this relationship be severed, through an “accommodation of a Palestinian Israeli autonomy within the institutions of the Israeli state” (Veracini 2006). The nature of this relationship seems to be hidden or conventionally thought of as non-existent, according to Veracini, even so, this does not eliminate the fact that a colonising society is currently living in the occupied territories.

Other scholars, such as Daiva Stasiulis and Nira Yuval-Davis, have included Israel in their global analysis of settler societies[6] (Tyrrell 2002, Adas 2001, Stasiulis and Yuval-Davis 1995).

This allegations are placed in a scholarly framework in the light that within the foundations of [settler] cultural nationalism, we can identify one vector of difference (the difference between colonizing subject and colonized subject: settler-Indigene) "being replaced by another in a strategic disavowal of the colonizing act". The national is what replaces the indigenous and in doing so conceals its participation in colonization by nominating a new colonized subject - the colonizer or invader-settler" (Lawson 1995). [7]

Such opinions have also been echoed in the diplomatic world, particularly in the non-aligned movement. Ambassador Rastam Mohd Isa, former permanent representative of Malaysia to the United Nations has condemned "the continuing and escalating Israeli military campaign against the Palestinian people, in particular the willful killing of civilians, including extrajudicial executions; demolition of homes and paralyzing closures; excessive and indiscriminate use of force, and continuing settler colonial activities"[8]

Similar opinions can be found in the Palestinian side of the conflict - Jamil Hilal, a Palestinian sociologist and writer living in the West Bank, and member of the Palestinian National Council, draws parallels between the South African settler colonialism and Israel, noting that "as in Southern Africa, stretches of land were acquired by the Zionist settlers [...] and their Arab tenants thrown out"[9]. He also notes that the Israeli case has in common with South Africa the fact that a dispossession of the indigenous population of their land by Europeans[10] took place. Lastly, he singles out South Africa as the only country in Africa to give support in the United Nations to the establishment of Israel in 1948[11].

[edit] Settler colonialism in Latin-America

In the case of Mexico, the Mexican independence movement was initiated by criollos who wanted to seize the power from the Spanish settlers. Miguel Hidalgo used banners with the slogans which included "Long live Fernando VII!, Long live the Americas and death to the corrupt government!".

Thus, the independence movement was not so much aimed at breaking off Mexico's ties to Spain as it was to seize power from a corrupt elite to claim it for a new elite in Mexico. Many years later a popular uprising would be triggered by the past existence of the castas system, a very concentrated land ownership, an economical system in which majority of the population lived in extreme poverty, and deep social unrest.

A result of the cultural heritage of the Spanish in Mexico was a deeply troubled history starting with Mexico's independence. After that, it resulted in a dominant party system, in which a single political party controlled all affairs in a ruthless and irresponsible manner for 70 years.

[edit] See also

[edit] Further reading

[edit] References

  1. ^ Summary
  2. ^ Smith, L. (1980), The Aboriginal Population of Australia, Australian National University Press, Canberra
  3. ^ Tatz, C. (1999). Genocide in Australia, AIATSIS Research Discussion Papers No 8, Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, Canberra
  4. ^ Windschuttle, K. (2001). The Fabrication of Aboriginal History, The New Criterion Vol. 20, No. 1, September 20.
  5. ^ b o r d e r l a n d s e-journal
  6. ^ Barnes & Noble.com - Books: Unsettling Settler Societies, by Daiva Stasiulis, Paperback
  7. ^ Johnston, Anna and Lawson, Alan (2000) 'Settler Colonies', in Schwarz, Henry and Ray, Sangeeta (eds) A Companion to Postcolonial Studies, Boston: Blackwell, pp. 360-376.
  8. ^ Situation in the Middle East - Palestine
  9. ^ archive.lib.msu.edu/DMC/African%20Journals/pdfs/Utafiti/vol1no1/aejp001001004.pdf
  10. ^ archive.lib.msu.edu/DMC/African%20Journals/pdfs/Utafiti/vol1no1/aejp001001004.pdf
  11. ^ archive.lib.msu.edu/DMC/African%20Journals/pdfs/Utafiti/vol1no1/aejp001001004.pdf
v • d • e
Colonialism