Talk:Serial Mom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.

the movies on the tv sentance is bad. I tried to fix it. Maybe we need a complete list of the movies.--Gbleem 22:21, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Fictional?

Can someone please cite a source that states that this is completely fictional? Is it not even tangentially based on a similar event? I was unable to find that information in the IMDB page. Check out the commentary if you have the DVD, and let me know what John has to say. - Asarkees

In the beginning of the DVD commentary, he says "In the beginning it has this thing that says 'All this was true' and everything. You'd be surprised at how many people really believed that. I have people who say, 'Well, where can I get the book?' ... People really believed that this was true in the beginning, that it was based on a true crime book." Sam 06:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Plot summary

Is that a plot summary, or a novelization? -- AvatarMN 22:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

I know! Why not just copy and paste the entire script? It would take less time to just watch the movie.71.63.119.49 (talk) 09:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Serialmomdvd.jpg

Image:Serialmomdvd.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Item too trivial for trivia section (!)

The following was removed from the trivia section. It is posted here as an example of what not to include in an entry:

  • In John Waters' original 1992 script, several small details vary from the final product:

In the original version, rather that Misty asking "Do you think i could get 50 cents for The Village People on Vinyl?" and Chip replying "You might get a buck" she asks "Do you think i can get 50 cents for Vanilla Ice?" to which Chip replies "I wouldn't give you a nickel"

I'm a big fan of John Waters' films too, but when I'm writing about them I try to exercise restraint about what information to include. His scripts are loaded with numerous plot twists and quotable lines. But unless the item is relevant to the plot summary, or a memorable line can be included in the text of the entry — not a trivia section — I won't include it. I'd love to, but it ain't Wiki-like. So, dear writers, please step back from your work and ask yourself, "Is this really relevant, or can I delete it?" Thank you. Kinkyturnip (talk) 14:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)