Talk:Sergei Parajanov
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Sergei Parajanov is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to better improve and organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. |
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to actors and filmmakers on Wikipedia. | ||
[edit] Parajanov vs. Paradzhanov
I see about 500 Googles for Parajanov and about 20000 for Paradzhanov. In the interests of accessibility I suggest changing the name in Wikipedia to match the generally used one. Martin Cleaver 09:03, 31 December 2006
- Not from what I see. "Parajanov", besides making more sense (the sound of "dzh" is equivalent to the sound of "j"), is the more widely used of the two. 56,100 to 19,800. 21,400 to 768. 1610 to 622. However you look at it. Esn 09:00, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Parajanov in prison
Parajanov was sentenced for his homosexuality - why is this side-stepped in the article? He himself referred to this as being convicted "for raping a Communist party member" - this was hardly a setup by the authorities, as the article tries to paint. Moreover, he was again sentenced in 1982 for a year for bribery - why is this left out? Parajanov.com mentiones the second conviction in his bio, and the truth about the first one is all over the sources on the guy.
Don't denigrate Parajanov by lying about him. He was a homosexual and briber, there is nothing to be ashamed about in that.
- Parajanov makes no mention of his aberration in "Confession", so his own position should be respected.Galassi 12:53, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
He does not? "I am glad that the investigation was not able to accuse me of anything other than inflating my 'aberration'". This does sound like a mention of an aberration. And if you remember that Confession is heavily edited to remove lots of original Parajanov's passages about people he did not like, about his homosexuality, etc., then it's more about his heirs' position than about his own one.
And since when a factual article shoud adhere to the position of the person it describes? Parajanov was in jail for raping a man. Then for bribing an official. Perhaps people need to know that whether he, or his heirs, or his fans approve of that knowledge or not.
- Why don't you contact his son and daughter and get their permission? And do you have unedited Confession? Galassi 00:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
He didn't confess his homosexuality in Confession. So I see his position was "not to confess it", I didn't find any resource where he was negating his homosexuality. And his web site says that he was arrested for his homosexuality when he was 23. I think it should be included into the article. Steelmate (talk) 17:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Parajanov.com belongs to another filmmaker and seems to exist for the sole purpose of his self-promotion. There is no reason to consider it a Reliable Source.Galassi (talk) 19:25, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Ashikkeribposter.jpg
The image Image:Ashikkeribposter.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
-
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
