Serfdom in Tibet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The neutrality of this article is disputed.
Please see the discussion on the talk page.(May 2008)
Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved.

This article needs additional citations for verification.
Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (May 2008)

The existence of serfdom in Tibet has been debated by scholars since the advent of Tibetology. Whether pre-communist Tibetan society was especially oppressive or whether it was comparable to similar social structures in other regions, the existence of slavery in the explicit sense of trade in human beings, and whether Tibetan society can be described using Western term like serf and feudalism are unresolved questions in the field.

1 Hierachical structure of society
2 Slavery
3 References
4 External links and further reading
5 Bibliography

[edit] Hierachical structure of society

Prior to Communist takeover, there were three main classes: ordinary laypeople, lay noble, and monks.^[1] The ordinary layperson could be further classified as a peasant farmer (shing-pa) or nomadic pastoralist (trokpa).^{[citation needed]}

Living conditions varied by location, with some Tibetans in extreme poverty, and others able to grow enough food to be immune to famine. Author Israel Epstein, a member of the Chinese Communist Party, described in some worst cases serfs had to hand over children to the manor as household slaves or nangzan, because they were too poor to keep them alive.^[2] In some areas, according to other western travellers, many serfs were able to feed themselves.^[3]

Melvyn Goldstein, in his book A History of Modern Tibet argues that although serfdom was prevalent in Tibet, this did not mean that it was an entirely static society. There were several types of serf sub-status, of which one of the most important was the "human lease", which enabled a serf to acquire a degree of personal freedom. This was because it offered an alternative in which, despite retaining the concept of lordship, the serfs were not bound to a landed estate. ^[4]

[edit] Slavery

Sir Charles Bell, a British colonial officer, also a renowned Tibet Scholar and a personal friend of the 13th Dalai Lama said:

"The slavery in the Chumpi valley was of a very mild type. If a slave was not well treated, it was easy for him to escape into Sikkim and British India."^[5]

[edit] References

^ Snellgrove, Cultural History, pp. 257–9
^ Tibet Transformed. by Israel Epstein Pg.46
^ The Story of Tibet by Tomas Laird, Pg 319
^ Serfdom and mobility: an examination of the institution of "human lease" in traditional Tibetan society. By Melvyn C. Goldstein. Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 30, no. 3(May 1971) pg 521-34
^ Charles Bell, Tibet Past and Present, 79.