Image talk:SerBac.jpg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Saints ImageSerBac.jpg is part of the WikiProject Saints, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to saints as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to saints. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Saints Portal
Image This article has been rated as Image-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Fair use disputed

Is it actually fair-use to have this image when there is a public domain image(Image:Sergebac7thcentury.jpg) that illustrates the same saints? The image is not being used in a discussion about the artwork, only in discussing the saints also depicted in the free image. Aleta 09:01, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

I have provided a fair use rationale, at Image:SerBac.jpg#Fair use rationale, and incorporated discussion of the painting into the articles where it is used, History of Christianity and homosexuality and Saints Sergius and Bacchus. I believe this now satisfies fair use criteria. — coelacan talk — 10:26, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
I would support the view that this is not replaceable by the public domain image. One work of art is generally not a substitute for another unless solely intended to show what someone looks like. This painting is being used to show the artists view of the relationship between the subjects and illustrates that in both articles. There is no public domain substitute for the painting in that context. WJBscribe -WJB talk- 17:16, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
  • With both the expanded fair use rationale and inclusion of discussion of the artwork itself in the articles, I think it now meets fair use. I have removed the dispute tags from the image page. Good work, Coelacan and WJBscribe! :) Aleta 17:53, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Righto. Please also watchlist the articles it is included in; we've already seen a user (CRCulver) attempt to remove the image disussion text under spurious pseudolegalistic argument. [1] [2] Thanks, — coelacan talk — 18:11, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 5, 2007

This has been ongoing. I really don't believe the fair use claim here holds water. It is arguable that this image meets fair use simply because it portrays these two saints in a homoerotic way (it is also arguable that it portrays them as identifiably "gay" at all). Further it fails other WP:NFC criteria as well; specifically #3, minimal usage, which states that non-free content is to be used "only if necessary", and #8, significance, which states it should only be used if its "presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." That is not the case here at the article in which it is currently included.--Cúchullain t/c 21:55, 5 November 2007 (UTC)