User talk:Seo75

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to my talk page.
  • Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page.
  • Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end.
  • Please use a new ==Descriptive heading== for new topics.
  • Please indent your posts with ":" if replying to an existing topic (or "::" if replying to a reply).
  • I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to Watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.

⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

Archives


Contents

[edit] re Image:Eclipse-mints-orange-and-cinnamon-flavours.JPG

Did you really take this photo? See Talk:Eclipse (mints). Herostratus (talk) 15:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I really did take that photo; reply made to the discussion.  SEO75 [talk] 00:22, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Citytrain maps

Yeah, about to work on the Gold Coast map before I hit the hay, which was done earlier in a experiment by another user but eventually caused layout issue concerns. So I'll be giving the GCL a go again using the format you've put up, and see how that goes. (Edit: seemed that GC template was done by time rather than KM, and tired as is, so I'll sort it tommorow arv as well) So i'll look at getting the Cleveland line, and probably Nambour/Gympie a shot tommorow afternoon. Let me know if you got any of the lines ready to go --Arnzy (talk · contribs) 16:14, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Suburbs of Brisbane

Obviously I disagree; similar to Category:Suburbs of Sydney and Category:Suburbs of Melbourne, the category should cover all neighbourhoods in the greater Brisbane urban area, regardless of LGA. However, I am aware that WP:BRIS feels differently so I won't argue the point.

The reason I changed the category was because they were using Category:Towns in Queensland which is clearly inappropriate. I am only interested in rural Queensland and have no interest in the SEQ conurbation at all. Sorry if I caused any problems. -- Mattinbgn\talk 05:07, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Of course, with the amalgamations it is much too late to create a new cat for Redcliffe. The amalgamations will be a nightmare for me as well, having to update all the infoboxes for Queensland towns. Oh well. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 05:49, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Re council amalgamations - while some will go into the new article it's anticipated a fair amount of it would stay at the old. I'm busily dealing with the 1994 Victorian amalgamations at the moment, which involves creating a whole bunch of articles for lapsed Victorian entities such as City of Altona. Orderinchaos 10:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
That's correct - my understanding would be that the new articles would be primarily about the new entities, with a history section which links back to the old ones and briefly summarises them. Allows us to keep good content where it is and use it elsewhere if need be. Orderinchaos 13:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Brisbane railway template image header

I think the railway articles should have QR maroon and white or maroon and yellow colour headings just like Melbourne's template is similar to the Connex colours. Even though Melbourne's public transport funds are collected by Metlink just like Brisbane's is by Translink, they have used the colours of the rolling stock operators. The same applies for Sydney as well where they have used the colours of CityRail for the railway templates.

If you decide to go with Translink colours, can I suggest using one of the colours other than white for the background. It stands out more and looks more appealing. I reverted the changes you made recently because there is an error in the template heading image probably due to the left image and right image script, thanks. My other login is Nevercoast if you need to contact, forgot to log in. 124.254.103.130 (talk) 09:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Firstly, Melbourne's templates mimic Metlink, not Connex, which is exactly what I am trying to similarly achieve with the new template mimicking TransLink. Secondly, you can't get better contrast that dark blue on a white background for ease of reading, which I would suspect is why the designers of TransLink's visual identity scheme went that way. Lastly, if something doesn't appear correctly, I'd be appreciative to see a screenshot of it – I tested it in Firefox and Internet Explorer, and the only problem I witnessed was IE not obeying the specified table row width (which I eventually fixed). Thanks.  SEO75 [talk] 15:51, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Citytrain template

User:Matt ke had revert to his earlier version, but stuffed up the brisways and he had cited problems before that he didnt explain earlier. Reverted each other once only (to avoid getting into a war), but then done a hybrid version of the infobox retaining the current TL theme and borders. Any issues, let me know. --Arnzy (talk · contribs) 15:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that, was too tired to explain myself last night :P. Yep the header got stuffed up in IE and firefox in my computer and my company's computer, thus I was trying to fix it but I used the wrong version as I was looking through the editing history. matt-(my page-leave me a message) 23:32, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Can't provide an screenshot at the mo but it goes like this (if you know what I mean):

                   Translink

- - - - - - -

|train station             <train logo>

- - - - - - -

matt-(my page-leave me a message) 14:36, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Brisbane meetup

Riverside Precinct Brisbane Meetup
Next: In Discussion
Last: February 10, 2008
This box: view • talk • edit

Delivered on behalf of Dihydrogen Monoxide. Giggabot (talk) 14:22, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Translink infoboxes

One more issue with the infoboxes is that the co-ordinates appear to overlap the image in the infobox. If the script is corrected so that the co-ordinates appear above the infobox then it should be perfect. This is happening on Internet Explorer 7, Thanks.

Nevercoast (talk) 04:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I've never understood why we would would want to have co-ordinates listed in an Infobox in the top-right of the article, immediately under the co-ordinates at the top-right-most of the page! Thank you IE7, a bug that really is a feature! Remove inline from the co-ordinates tag (leaving just display=title only), and move the whole co-ordinates tag to the bottom of the page.  SEO75 [talk] 09:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Redcliffe-city-brand.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Redcliffe-city-brand.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 11:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Big-W-brand.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Big-W-brand.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:44, 22 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sundaymail bne frontpage.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sundaymail bne frontpage.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] ABC logo

Hi Seo75. I put the new logo at the top of the TV page. I think it's a reasonable move, as the ABC management have already said they'll be using the new logo in a few days. It's the talk of the town. Papers & talk back. ABC management are doing radio and news interviews about it. I think it's reasonable to be bold and use it at top of page.Lester 01:09, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Savvytel-brand.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Savvytel-brand.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 04:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:QR-brand.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:QR-brand.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 04:04, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sundaymail bne frontpage.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sundaymail bne frontpage.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:19, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey that was me removed that tag the bot placed on the Sunday Mail image page. The fair use rationale should have stopped the bot? Sting au Buzz Me... 03:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Melbourne-exhibition-and-convention-centre-brand.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Melbourne-exhibition-and-convention-centre-brand.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:42, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ferny Grove to Dayboro train line

Hey. I just took a look at the modifications you made to the Camp Mountain train disaster page, and noticed you had a partial map of the original Dayboro train line. I was wondering if you had a complete map of the line at all? Or know where I can find one? Nice photography by the way! - Kensane (talk) 11:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. :) No, unfortunately I don't have a map of the full length of the former line out to Dayboro. If I did, and I'm sure it is in at least one gunzel book out there (just unfortunately not on-line so it seems), I would map it and create an article for the line. It is why I have included a bit about the use of the Dayboro line in the Camp Mountain train disaster article – it isn't essential, but it helps introduce the use of the line as a backgrounder (and since I've found out that much about it so far, it may as well go in for safe-keeping for the time being). All I could find using on-line sources is up to about McDowalls and Mount Samson Roads, only a little past where I have mapped in the Camp Mountain train disaster article. If you do source a map of the full line, I would be interested in seeing it and recreating a map of it.  SEO75 [talk] 00:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Ahhh true. Well certainly, I'll send you a copy if I ever find a map of the train line; as from what I've heard it's had an interesting history. I might even know of a few places where to find a map as I used to live in Dayboro. Just by looking at your map, its interesting to see that a few roads have been built out of the original railway line. Kensane (talk) 08:38, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Heads up

RE your recent revert on Brisbane, where the map image is replaced, seems to be the work of a user that frequently uploads QLD related material of dubious copyright status and embeds it into articles. I suggest watching the IP/user closely, if you are around (I seldom am nowadays) and open a dialogue with the user if you see it happening more and feel up to it. Cheers, aliasd·U·T 06:41, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:3-brand.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:3-brand.svg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:06, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] QR Map on Commons

I think that the image you designed at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Citytrain-railway-network-map.png is a fantastic resource, but it appears that Nundah station (between Northgate and Toombul in the orange section) is mislabelled as "Nudgee". The real Nudgee station is correctly labelled though.

As I don't have the source of the image, would you be able to correct and reupload? Thanks! Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC).

Whoops! Close, but... Thank you for alerting me to that. I have fixed all affected files.  SEO75 [talk] 03:13, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ferrero-brand.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ferrero-brand.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:13, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Brisbane meetup invitation

Riverside Precinct Brisbane Meetup
Next: In Discussion
Last: February 10, 2008
This box: view • talk • edit

Hey there, you're invited to the second Brisbane Meetup. Please see the page at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/2 for more details. Hope to see you there!

Automated message delivered by Giggabot (stop!) to Wikipedians in Queensland and known Brisbaneites, at 03:50, 7 June 2008 (UTC).