User talk:Senzeichi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Estonia-geo-stub
Hi - I note you've recently created a new stub category. Did you realise that stub categories should normally be cleared by Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting before creation? It is clearly stated on almost every stub-related page and in almost every stub category that this should be done. That way they can be vetted to check that there are a viable number of stubs (at least 60-100) and that the category does not cross the existing stub hierarchy before the stub is created.
If you can provide any information on why the stub was created, please add a note to entry for the stub at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Criteria#Newly-discovered stub categories giving the reason for it. In addition, if there is any Wikiproject associated with the stub add that information. Thanks.
In the case of this stub, it is viable, so there should be no problem. However, given that the vast majority of stubs are sorted by the stub sorting wikiproject, it would have been very useful to have followed the standard procedures, and proposed the stub with them first. Grutness...wha? 05:45, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
- I think I was too enthusiastic :( I should've read the Wikipedia:Stub article to the end first. Sorry! Senzeichi 22:23, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Estonian geography stubs
I thought you might like to know that "Estonian geography stubs" has been renamed to "Estonia geography stubs" (as per WP:SFD), so that you can update your Contributions page. --TheParanoidOne 13:59, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Communes vs municipalities
What do you think about renaming Estonian "communes" to "municipalities". Commune sounds very strange. Besides, in Estonia vald is usually translated as municipality. Andres 15:19, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Sillamae in Estonia.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sillamae in Estonia.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. |EPO| 10:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC)