Talk:Semir Osmanagić

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

His research coincides with edgar cayce's theory.

[edit] Archaeologist?

As archaeology is a true profession requiring extensive education, training, and experience, isn't it biased to use this term to describe Osmanagić, even with the qualifier "hobby"? It's like saying someone is a hobby surgeon.

At the same time, wouldn't pseudoarchaeolgist, pyramidologist or especially pseudohistorian be more descriptive and unbiased terms, given what his publications? (Ronz 01:38, 20 May 2006 (UTC))

I think it's reasonable to refer to non-professionals engaged in archaeological digs as "hobbyist" or "amateur" archaeologists. On the other hand, adding "pseudo" in front of a title or profession someone claims is making a POV judgement. — JEREMY 02:11, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Sounds like positive bias to me. He's not just engaged in a dig, he's the one justifiying it, raising the funds, and claiming he has the expertise to know what is there. He's a hobby surgeon doing open heart surgery, telling everyone that it all going well. (Ronz 23:06, 20 May 2006 (UTC))

Removed all claims about Osmanagić from the introduction that have been criticised by highly reliable and verifiable sources such as Archaeology magazine. --Ronz 20:11, 13 August 2006 (UTC)