Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/May 22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for making suggestions or discussing improvements to Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/May 22.

  • Before making a suggestion, please read the selected anniversaries guidelines. This list usually defers to supporting pages when there is disagreement, so it is best to achieve consensus and make any necessary changes there first.
  • To discuss improvements to the corresponding May 22 article, see Talk:May 22 instead.
  • If Saladin survived, it should be an "assassination attempt". --L33tminion (talk) 17:13, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
    • True that; how can one survive an assassination?? Phoenix2 02:13, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
It was a failed assassination. -- PFHLai 04:12, 2005 May 23 (UTC)

{{editprotected}}

The page currenty states that:

However, the article states that five trains were involved - two stationary, and three moving. Can I suggest that the point is changed to:

Mike Peel 09:32, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

N Not done I've been reading the article and its sources, and as far as I can tell there were four trains involved in the crash, and a fifth train (the goods train) nearby that was not involved in the crash. I think the article might be slightly misleading in this regard. Could you point me to something in the sources which would support all five trains being involved? --ais523 12:32, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
I don't know much about this, tbh: I was basing my suggestion purely on the article. Having read around a little more, the H2G2 article [1] says that all five were involved in the accident - "the engine of the troop train turned over sideways and came into contact with the empty wagon service" and "As the 600 tonne express train arrived it ran through the wreckage to hit the rear part of troop train's engine, which it proceeded to push through the wagons of the 4.50 goods service". So both trains in the sidings were involved; obviously all of the express train, troup train and local train were also involved, summing to a total of 5. Whether or not H2G2 counts as a reliable reference is another matter, though. Mike Peel 16:32, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Y Done That source seems to contain the information required. I've made the change. --ais523 10:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)