User talk:SeljukTurk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, SeljukTurk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Baristarim 10:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Seljuq dynasty

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Seljuq dynasty page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. 10:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

What I consider as vandalism is the pan-iranians attempt at changing history. Simply said, the Seljuk dynasty is NOT a part of 'History of Greater Iran'. This claim is absolutely ridiculous. It's like Greeks claiming the Ottoman Empire as their own.

The biggest nonsense is the Iranian template.

SeljukTurk 10:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Akrep 00.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Akrep 00.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:05, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edit Summary

I noticed that you didn't leave an edit summary for your edits to Naval Battle of Elli. Using edit summaries is a good practice, see Help:Edit summary:

"It is good practice to fill in the Edit Summary field, or add to it in the case of section editing, as it helps everyone to understand what is changed, such as when perusing the history of the page. It's a good idea to set your user preferences (under Edit) to 'Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary'."

also,

"Always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may question your motives for the edit."

Finally, if you would like to discuss the substantive nature of your edit to the infobox, we can do it on the talk page of the article.

Cheers and welcome! Argos'Dad 13:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)