Talk:Selling technique

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have issues with external links for courses for fee being offered and should be removed (unless significant sales topics are available on their sites.) It takes away from the neutrality/credibility of wikipedia. Phonix 04:56, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

I would agree with that. The only ones that you could make a case for are Hopkins or Ziglar's own sites as they are very prominent, but there's no real need to link to them either. - Taxman ^Talk 09:07, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Is there a reason why there are no articles on topics such as "Handling Objections"? Is it an editorial policy or is it just that no one has written it yet? People who don't agree that objections are always a sign of interest or a request for more information (as many sales books claim) might want more information on that topic.

[edit] Handling Objections

Handling objections should definitely have it's own link. Agreed72.189.153.244 16:55, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Question

I actually came to this page searching for information about the practice of offering a "Same Day Incentive" in which salespeople offer a discount only if a customer closes then and there at the closing table, as opposed to "sleeping on it" and coming back later.

Does anyone have information on this? Legality, etc.? 72.189.153.244 18:09, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] External Links

I've read the policies and removed the two links that didn't apply. The third is neutral and isn't a fee site (free information), so it meets your requirements.