From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Did you read the link I sent you to? IF you wish to re-add the details, please either closely paraphrase the wording in the articles, or try and write as if you are sympathetic to the other point of view. If you haven't read it before, read WP:NPOV. When making major edits of the sort you are, saying things like 'everyone knows' isn't helpful. You shouldn't make any claims beyond what is said in the articles; not even something that seems obvious to you. That's WP:OR. Also please read WP:3RR. Relata refero (talk) 21:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] son of a secretary
Hatred? Yes and no. I hate your hypocrisy young man. I have many friends among your comrades. I particularly dislike people who advocate atheism in public (and denounce Namboodiripad as a hypocrite because he visited temples with his wife, or Harkishan Singh for his religious turban) and conveniently get married in church. You know who I have in mind. The same guy, as party's state secretary in Kerala, while insisting on the party members to send their children to Malayalam medium school, very conveniently gave his own progeny English medium schooling. Is it mere coincidence that you are his namesake? 59.91.254.110 (talk) 09:12, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Unblock request
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "This user id is of an idividual. It is unfortunate that he is blamed of being a puppet of SUCIIndia or Unitysuci. All three are accounts handled by seperate users."
Decline reason: "See the Checkuser case —Daniel Case (talk) 14:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "Please read the comments by idependant editors such as User: Soman. This user did not do anything to evade 3rr. It was only a on few occassions that this user ever accessed the page of SUCIndia."
Decline reason: "Checkuser confirms you as a sockpuppet. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 14:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
[edit] Unblock request
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "This block was not for creating a puppet. This block was made by claiming that I abused my account. This is not true. Please note that it is a puppet of User: Kuntan who abused me and not me who abused any one. See the personal abuses that he has made in my page and in SUCI page. Why do the admins ignore the comments of other editors who were actively involved in this issue. There are at least two editors who have made substantial contributions to Wikipedia who have demanded to unblock this account and/or User: Suciindia"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
.--Sekharlk (talk) 15:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
