Talk:Seiche
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://www.seiche.com/ Seiche acoustics page
is not relevant enough to seiches to warrant a link on seiche article. The lack of a solid connection is even explained on
http://www.seiche.com/2.%20Admin/SeichePage.html Why seiche?
, which gives the superficial -- albeit not inappropriate -- reasons the term was chosen by Imperial College, etc.
[edit] Sietch
According to that article, the pronunciation bears only a passing similiarity, about as much as the English words "which" and "was" bear to each other. Anyone here have a better way of rephrasing this, or should the link just be removed entirely as an irrelevancy? Rhialto 06:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] GA potential
Informationwise, this is a very good article. The problem is that it lacks inline references, which is one of the GA criteria nowadays. Once it gets inline references, it can easily be upgraded to B class, and submitted for GAC. Thegreatdr (talk) 05:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Chicago?
I'm not really sure how this pertains to Chicago in any way, so I'm removing the tag for now until someone can give me a clear reason why it should be tagged as part of that project ~ Triberocker (talk) 19:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)