User talk:Secluzs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Speedy deletion of Math cognition

A tag has been placed on Math cognition requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Madlobster (talk) 17:31, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Mark H. Ashcraft

A tag has been placed on Mark H. Ashcraft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rob Banzai (talk) 18:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Math cognition. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. — Insanity Incarnate 20:16, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I've cleaned up your articles on Mark H. Ashcraft and Mathematical cognition a bit, but you really should at least expand the latter article a bit; at the moment it doesn't really tell anything useful to a reader looking for information on the subject. At a bare minimum, an article should provide a basic definition of its subject that clearly distinguishes it from related topics. You may also want to take a look at our help pages and our Manual of Style for basic information on how to write a Wikipedia article. Happy editing, and feel free to contact me if you have any problems. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 20:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)