Talk:Secure Computing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is a blatent ad. This article is cleary biased towards the company in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miltonmonkey (talk • contribs) 01:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

• No, it's not blatant (note the spelling for next time). Whether positive or negative, encyclopedia entries for companies are important in that they describe mergers of products and product lines - that is devilishly difficult information to find. Wikipedia is one of the few accessible sources of such information, and it's valuable regardless of sounding fanboy or not. Cryptosmith (Rick Smith) 20:46, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

I think covering some of the controversy concerning SmartFilter is warranted. For example: sethf.com/anticensorware/smartfilter/gotalist.php 68.238.51.102 22:42, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

• I have to ask - why toss this in instead of writing in something in the main entry? I haven't studied censorware much myself, and Seth Finkelstein's discussion of SmartFilter noted in the link above is interesting. I don't know if many or most of his observations are exclusive to SmartFilter, but the discussion is worth linking to. Cryptosmith (Rick Smith) 04:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Many of the subsections were written by a fanboy or someone from the company. IT sounds a lot like marketing, and could use a NPOV scrub. I would do it were I more directly familiar with all of the individual components. Tolstoy143 - "Quos vult perdere dementat" 11:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)