Talk:Secular saint

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 13 November 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.
WikiProject Saints Secular saint is part of the WikiProject Saints, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to saints as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to saints. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Socrates This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Removed section

previously moved from Patron Saint:

[edit] Patron saints in the arts

[edit] Consider Princess Diana

Perhaps the late Princess Diana should be added to the list, since no marital infidelity was reported during her marriage to Prince Charles. -Wikid77 16:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

When you use the word "perhaps," does that mean you intend your remark as a joke? If not, why not? 67.166.31.135 18:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Remove MLK, Jr.

Perhaps remove "Martin Luther King, Jr." from the list after reports of bedroom antics recorded in secret audio tapes made at the direction of FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover (search the Internet). -Wikid77 16:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of "Secular Saints" doesn't cite sources, looks like Original Research

My vote is to eliminate this section unless someone can provide references. At present it smacks of WP:OR. Majoreditor 03:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

On second thought, I am going to be bold and eliminate the section. I am also downgrading the article to stub since there's not much left after removing the original research. Majoreditor 03:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Please follow WP policies and provide specific citations. If you're going to list specific secular saints you need to provide a specific page cite from a reliable source. These could include a newspaper, magazine or website. Thanks, Majoreditor 03:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dubious?

I've tagged the following as dubious:

[edit] References and further reading


[edit] Deletion?

Should this article be deleted? It needs some dedicated work to bring it up to par. If it can't be salvaged then perhaps we should consider deletion. Thoughts, anyone? Majoreditor 01:56, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 04:26, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD Discussion

The final results from the AFD discussion were: Keep, 3 votes; Weak Keep, 4 votes; Weak Delete, 1 vote; Delete, nominator only.

Some of the comments suggested cleaning up the article to remove unsourced statements. I will do so shortly. Majoreditor (talk) 02:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)