Talk:Secretaría de Inteligencia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Secretaría de Inteligencia article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Secretaría de Inteligencia has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
Article milestones Date Process Result April 27, 2006 Good article nominee Listed September 18, 2006 Peer review Reviewed Current Status: Good article

	This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentine politics. If you would like to participate, you can improve Secretaría de Inteligencia, or sign up and contribute in a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.

To-do list for Secretaría de Inteligencia:	edit · history · watch · refresh
Add 'Organization of Personnel' section with the guide of 'Cuadros y Subcuadros'. Get a complete and accurate list of historical Secretaries of Intelligence. See List of Argentine Secretaries of Intelligence.

The following user(s) are actively involved with this article and may be able to help with questions about verification and sources: Sanmarcos (talk · contribs), OneEuropeanHeart (talk · contribs) This in no way implies article ownership; all editors are encouraged to contribute.

Old comments for Secretaría de Inteligencia are archived here: Archive1.

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.

[edit] Move?

This page should be moved to an English title (as per WP:UE). Should we use Intelligence Secretariat (Argentina) or something like that? —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 23:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

• Why not just create a redirect? This page is a work of art!. 10.000 lines of BASIC --San Marcos 11:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

He didn't mean changing the content of the article, just changing the article's title. Mariano(t/c) 11:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

The correct title should be Secretariat of Intelligence, without the (Argentina). —Aucun effort n'est trop grand 03:27, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

So, do we agree on the move to Secretariat of Intelligence?, should it have the (Argentina) suffix, as other countries might use the same name?. --San Marcos 19:03, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

The (Argentina) suffix is absolutely unnecessary. As Google Search clearly states, Argentina is the only country in the entire world with an agency called Secretariat of Intelligence. —Aucun effort n'est trop grand 02:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Becoming A-Class/Featured

As per the Quality Guidelines, I want this article to be a top-notch Argentine A-class, or even a Featured one. If anybody else is interested on taking on such a project, please add on here what we should modify in the article. I am in the process of adquiring the new book by Gerardo Young, 'SIDE: La Argentina Secreta' to bring new information and references to the article. --San Marcos 19:09, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

We're thinking the same thought. In my opinion, and as per WP:WIAFA, the article needs a lot more references, and perhaps an additional rewording and cleanup. Footnotes are of critical importance here; as you probably noticed, the main problem with espionage-related articles is that the verifiability of its content can be permanently disputed, see WP:V. By the way, the level of detail is more than acceptable (finally some good news) and the page's perfectly stable — in fact, no edit war has ever happened! Hope this helps, —Aucun effort n'est trop grand 02:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

In the following weeks, or when I have time I will be forking the article again into my own copy to add a bunch of information, and rewriting the troubled parts. Expect big changes soon. --San Marcos 22:05, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Operacion Marilyn?

The text about an alleged Operacion Marilyn, intended to obtain information from Cuban diplomats, does not contain any reference, it has not been mentioned in any widely available book about the SIDE, and a Google / Yahoo search gave no related results at all. If somebody knows a reliable reference please include within the text. Otherwise it should be considered an unverified rumor and removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.34.11.225 (talk) 02:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)