Talk:Secret (2007 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (nations and regions): Chinese cinema task force

[edit] Chinese names

Just to clear up something regarding the characters' names.

Ye Xiang Lun
Last name: Ye
First name: Xiang Lun

Lu Xiao Yu
Last name: Lu
First name: Xiao Yu

People should take note that Chinese names are different from Western names. The article currently refers to the characters by "Lun" and "Yu", which is half of their first name, which is really weird, not to mention it always ticks me off when Westerners exhibit their ignorance of Chinese nomenclature.

I will edit some of the names but I'm likely to grow bored soon. If anyone notices any mis-naming, please help and change them to their last names.--Secretss 06:56, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Formatting

Lots of good information here but needs formatting and copyediting to look and sound more like a typical Wikipedia article about a movie. Someone up for doing this? SeleneFN 17:30, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Exactly. This article looks extremely messy and needs some serious restructuring. I don't have a clue what that explanation of the scenes section is trying to say. 121.130.76.122 (talk) 12:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I vote for completely eliminating the three ridiculous sections: Explanations of Scenes, Plot Explanation, and Ending (another possibility). They're totally unnecessary, not to mention somewhat unintelligently written and sometimes incoherent and incomprehensible, and they so do not belong in a wikipedia article. This is not a movie fan page! The sections sound like they're written by some fool thinking they understand the movie and wishing to impress with their "awesome" deduction/analytical abilities. --Secretss (talk) 17:33, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

The sections you mentioned can also be interpreted as informational, but I agree; I'll see if I get the time to clean up those sections, and if I don't get around to it, just delete them. Danny Sepley (talk) 23:04, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

OK, looking back at those sections, I get the feeling that they're really annoying. It seems like the person that wrote it did not use good formatting. Overall, it detracts from the appearance of the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danny sepley (talk • contribs) 04:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tamkang 淡江?

Why is the school name romanised that way? 淡江 is pronounced as Dànjiāng in standard Mandarin. Or is it such a well-known name, which needs to written in a dialect pronunciation? --Atitarev (talk) 06:18, 8 May 2008 (UTC)