Talk:Second Ostend Raid
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] GA review
I have taken on Second Ostend Raid for review under the Good Article criteria, as nominated on the Good article candidates page by Jackyd101. You'll be pleased to hear that the article meets none of the quick-fail criteria, so I will shortly be conducting an in-depth review and will post the results below.
Where an article is not an outright pass, but requires relatively minor additional work to be brought up to GA standard, I will normally place it on hold - meaning that editors have around a week to address any issues raised. As a precaution to prevent failure by default should this occur, if editors are likely to be unavailable over the next ten days or so, feel free to leave a message on my talk page so we can arrange a more convenient time for review. Regards, EyeSereneTALK 13:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GA pass
Apologies for the delay in posting this assessment (busy RL lately!). However, I am pleased to tell you that Second Ostend Raid can be passed in its current form as a good article under the Good article criteria. I have listed it on the Good Articles page under History > War and military > Conflicts, battles and military exercises and updated any templates on this talk page. For the record, the following editors have been identified from the article history as contributing significantly: Jackyd101.
Congratulations, and well done! EyeSereneTALK 10:34, 28 September 2007 (UTC)