Talk:Second Macedonian War

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Greece, an attempt to expand, improve and standardize the content and structure of articles related to Greek history.
If you would like to participate, you can improve Second Macedonian War, or sign up and contribute in a wider array of articles like those on our to do list. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (comments)
Mid This article has been rated as a Mid priority article
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome. To participate, improve this article or visit the project page for more information.

Illyria was certainly a Roman province before 9 BC - I had though 167 BC, with indirect dominance for some decades before that, although I'm not certain. The hinterlands up to the Danube were not conquered until Augustus's time. But surely you know that there may have been someone named "Galba" who was not the same as the Roman emperor of that name. john k 06:31, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Yes you're right Illyria was a Roman province before well before 9 BC. Caesar had it in 59 BC. The last king Genthius of Illyria was defeated by L. Anicus Gallus in 168 BC. But even after that there was no permanent Roman administration for a long time. Of course as you say there had been indirect Roman control for some time. As for the reference to "Galba", I had supposed that they meant P. Sulpicius Galba, consul in 200 BC who did have Macedonia for his province, during the war, I think. Paul August 00:02, Oct 14, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Errors

Couple of things - did the Romans really issue an ultimatum? Where is the evidence to back this up? I thought at this stage Rome wasn't interested in conquests or provinces, but more as kindly protectors of Greeks and Greek culture?

Also, how can Phillip be a traitor when he was never Roman? You have to be of that country to be declared a traitor. It's like calling Osama a traitor to the USA...