User talk:Search4.0

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Veinor (ヴエノル^(talk)) 21:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not delete sections of text or valid links from Wikipedia articles, as you did to Arburg. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Veinor (ヴエノル^(talk)) 22:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 22:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Culinary art

There are two solutions to this issue, either reword the information into your own words and site a valid reference, or this citation and quote will be removed as it is from a search onto a page of your own which does not make it a valid academic source. It just means you typed it somewhere and placed it on wikipedia which does not make it a fact. Even if it was factual, pasting and copying quotations in the manner in which you have would be constituted as plagiarizing another website, even if you cite the source. You aren't quoting a person, which is what quotations of the sort are meant for. So eaither please find a way to fix it, or I will revert it to an earlier edit.--Christopher Tanner, CCC 23:34, 26 June 2007 (UTC)