User talk:Seancwatson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A tag has been placed on Preschool tea party massacre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste 04:35, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Please don't remove tags from pages you've created yourself; it's considered vandalism. You can use the {{hangon}} process noted above. YOu may wish to familiarize yourself with the information at WP:Notable and associated pages in order to understand the criteria that an administrator will use when deciding whether to delete the page. If I can be of further help, leave a note on my talk page. Accounting4Taste 04:43, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

I see you've recreated Preschool tea party massacre with considerably more information about the albums, and I have no intention of tagging it for deletion this time. I'm not an expert in this area, and have reached the point where I can't decide if the group is notable or not, but I note that these albums seem to be self-released and for that reason, as well as that the page has already been deleted once, you may want to keep an eye on it because it might get tagged again. (And you may also want to keep an eye on the images.) If there's something I can do to help, leave a note on my talk page -- and thanks for trying to work within Wikipedia's boundaries, it is appreciated. Accounting4Taste 05:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:DIAoutined.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DIAoutined.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Bawls has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.   jj137 (talk) 03:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)