User talk:Sean William/February 2007

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] And another

The Barnstar of Diligence
For catching Antandrus's detective work on ANI and following up with a RFCU. You have saved me an amazing amount of work! Kuru talk 00:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

This is literally the first barnstar I've awarded in my year here (ok, I gave out one margarita), but it's worth it. And a belated thank you for your recent vote and comments in my RFA - I'll work diligently on those category talk edits... :) Kuru talk 00:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for blocking me

At least, you could open my talk page, there are many people who are leaving me messages and want to talk to me. I also asked for user check id for mkil, i believe he used that against me, did you check on that. You know, i do not care if i am banned or not, just because i tried to help the banned person (see my talk page) does not mean i am him, can you try, to bring back my account, i only want to fix few things, then i will be gone from wiki. I can easily create new account, go on another ip, etc, etc, today I was told how to, i could simply edit from my new account, new ip, new articles I never touched, IMPOSSIBLE TO CATCH ME. I will not do that, if i am not welcomed on wiki, so be it, i will be gone and you loose good contributors, i contributed dozens of stories to eastsideboxing and to other sites. I am more than welcomed over there. Think what you want, if you think i am some other dude, fine, but remember, you passed your judgment on me really fast. And all of you should be ashamed. The funny thing is, one administrator blocked all the local ip's which serve about 10 000 people or more, now they can not edit this pathetic wiki, you know, that really MADE MY DAY, because when you blocked me, you blocked 1000's of others, LOL! Check my contrubutions, there are few people who thanked me for adding little known things.And I never ever vandalized pages with wrong information. Goes to show why administrators are bad, from the very beginning i was told not to trust them! BoxingWear --The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.201.183.18 (talk) 21:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC).

Great, now you are reporting me more, guess what ASSHOLE, i have another account i have been using for 2 years now, all on boxing and sport, if you think i am who i am, fine, whatever, does not change a thing, but you will never find out my another account which is in good standings and you will not be forgotten for being a jerk too, ok, have a nice life!Not. Boxingwear

I told you before: I am not an administrator. Go complain to somebody else. PTO 22:23, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
No problems PullToOpen. Let me know if you need any help, Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 00:32, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Novels newsletter : Issue IX - February 2007

The February 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 16:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My RFA
Thank You,
Sean William/February 2007 for your Support!
Thank you for your support in my RfA, which closed at 111 / 1 / 2. I am humbled and rather shocked to see such kind comments and for it to reach WP:100. Please feel free to leave a note if I have made a mistake or if you need anything, I will start out slow and tackle the harder work once I get accustomed to the tools. Thank you once more, I simply cannot express in words my gratitude.


...fly on littlewing. ~ Arjun 19:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] monobook

Due to a recent Wikipedia change, your monobook.js, if it uses the warn script I use, will need to have this change done to it. Prodego talk 02:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the message, but now I use a script that better suits the way that I go on RC patrol. Cheers, PTO 02:57, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

--// Sean William 17:08, 23 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Is this users actions allowed?

  • Hey there (:O) ... we have an ongoing debate over here on the status of an article. Now the thing I wanted to bring up was the editing and removal and well forceful rhetoric stating the result of the debate before it has even been decided. The one causing all this is User:Ideogram. I have tried so hard to be loving and understanding during this debate, but now I dont know if what the user is doing is right or wrong. I dont know who to go to, so I figure I may ask someone who is very familiar with the wikipedia world and how this should be dealt with maybe? Not sure. Please help. (:O) ---nima baghaei (talk) 03:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
    Replied on the user's talk page. PTO 05:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mung bean

Why did you give that Mung bean vandal a warning when I already gave him a *final* warning for vandalizing the same article? It's clearly blocking time. Badagnani 19:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

I warned the vandal to reiterate a point, and proceeded to report him/her to WP:AIV. However, there was already a listing there. I imagine that the "mung bean" vandal has been blocked by now. PTO 19:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC)