User talk:SeanLegassick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 AmEx link 2 Barnstar 3 Sacha Baron Cohen 4 Sacha Baron Cohen

[edit] AmEx link

A "bad link" is slang for a link that no longer functions. But I checked again and it's working, so I put it back. It's a very good link, by the way. --Ephilei 21:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		Over the last couple of days, I've come across your work on Wikipedia a number of times. In every instance, your contributions to each article have been immensely positive. Congratulations, and, thank you for helping make Wikipedia great! Justen 15:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sacha Baron Cohen

Read the notes I added to the talk pages for the sacha baron cohen article. specially the ones to the [1] 209.52.60.83 01:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

No I am not klymen. I don't really care about this whole thing either. I just think It's wrong to take something verifiable out, because someone's gut feeling is that it's wrong. Jack's case is not reasonable doubt and klymen is right in his argument. If it was reasonable I would have agreed to take it out. But you guys seem to give some random guy in wikipedia's talk pages who says he's Cohen's cousin more credit than the guradian. 209.52.60.83 19:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

You have to take in to account that not a lot of focus was on Sacha Baron Cohen before his Borat Movie. He might have been big in the UK, but here in North America he was simply a cult figure. Once his movie hit theaters all these articles surfaced. I bet you, you'll find very few articles about him before the borat movie, left alone articles that would talk about his family in detail. Either way, I believe the Persian Jew should stay, not that I am a Jew or Persian like Klymen, simply becuase I think someone's gut feeling and speculations should not be used to take out verfiable facts. If it the guardian is wrong then solid evidence will surface. If it's not wrong then we're taking out a fact simply because someone thinks the guardian is wrong with out any evidence. 209.52.60.83 19:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I can not speak for the Guardian writers. Just contact the writter of that article and see what's up. Don't wait for klymen to do it. If you're right, then by all means. I would take it out myself. The only reason I'm taking the stance I'm taking is because your arguments are not valid enough to take it out. I couldn't care less if his mother was Persian/chinesse/Hindu/Martian whatever. I believe it's wrong to take out what is verfiable simply because someone puts forth a logicaly invalid argument. 209.52.60.83 20:13, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sacha Baron Cohen

Someone is once again restoring the apparently faulty information about his mother's background to the article. If you could rejoin the discussion/editing of this article, maybe it can once again be settled. Regards, All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 06:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)