Talk:Seax-Wica

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Neopaganism, a WikiProject dedicated to expanding, organizing, verifying, and NPOVing articles related to neopagan religions. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

This is heavily POV and in any case needs to be merged with Seax-Wica —Ashley Y 10:05, 2004 Jun 1 (UTC)

Out of curiousity, is there anything left here that anyone feels is too POV-ish? Phil Urich 06:45, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

It looks pretty solid to me. I'd recommend taking down the NPOV tag, unless anybody objects. QuartierLatin1968 18:11, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] removed entire controversy section: NPOV/RS/BLP issues

I removed the entire controversy section itself for the following reasons: it failed to meet a Neutral Point of View standard; it lacked reliable sources (one person's online journal is not reliable, even if it were accurate); and it ran into BLP issues regarding Mark Ventimiglia.

I also removed the response section allegedly from Ventimiglia's press agent for similar reasons - NPOV-wise it served as an attack piece; RS it had no independent third party sources; BLP for issues regarding Ventimiglia and Daven.

In other issues, the alleged press agent seems to be reinterpreting the Rede as a Law, when the denotation of rede is counsel or advice.--Vidkun (talk) 15:33, 25 February 2008 (UTC)