Talk:Seavus Group
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject. | |
| Stub | rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
This article has been posted without any intention to advertise the company mentioned. So far I have seen many corporations which have included their history and credentials within the encyclopedia.
The article will be further updated in order to show the contribution of the company within new technologies that furter advance the IT technology. Please be patient.
- Unfortunately it reads like a typical PR puff piece, with phrases like "an innovative provider of information technology solutions", "the company has been able to deliver products and carry out projects around the world", "The company has grown rapidly as a result of the well developed NearShore Business Model for our services. This model provides our customers across the globe with access to the finest project management personnel, software products and support teams possible.". These are not neutral encyclopedic descriptions of the company, but advertising-speak with little or no actual content.
- Worse, there are no sources for any of the material included and its claim to notability is weak and unverifiable. As it stands there is a good chance the article will be proposed for deletion. It needs improvement. Thanks, Gwernol 12:33, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] How to follow Wikipedia critera for completion
As you know, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and has standards an article must fulfill before it is appropriate for inclustion.
To be included in Wikipedia, all articles must meet notability standards and verifiability standards as well as citing reliable sources
If you are a company, you must also meet standards for a company. Also, no original research is allowed per WP:OR. Check these policies out as well as WP:CITE and WP:RS meantioned above. Mattisse(talk) 12:39, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for the input
Guys, thanks for the info, I will consider revision and try doing my best by providing better information. Surelly I hope that this article will not qualify for deletion.
--Ivan Stamenov 13:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
