Talk:Seattle Public Schools

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Seattle Public Schools falls within the scope of the Seattle WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to Seattle, Washington, and who are involved in developing and proposing standards for their content, presentation and other aspects. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.
WikiProject Schools This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-Importance within Schools.

Contents

[edit] Supreme Court ruling?

I can't believe that there is nothing in here about the landmark US Supreme Court ruling or the SPS policy that provoked it. Anybody?66.157.232.183 17:34, 6 August 2007 (UTC) Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). --Lukobe 22:27, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

I just removed the internal links that several schools had in the list that were pointing to non existent pages, the schools are still listed but without the links. DMcMPO11AAUK 01:42, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Controversy"

It seems to me that the "Controversy" section is extremely one-sided. The nature of a controversy is that there are two sides to it. - Jmabel | Talk 04:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Former schools

We are missing a lot of them. I've added a few, mostly ones that were in the picture I added, but there are many more. - Jmabel | Talk 07:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

I've now probably covered more than half of them, but we are still far from complete. - Jmabel | Talk 08:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
About 25 that I'm aware of left to go. I've been adding a lot more information about these than we have on current schools. Eventually, we'll probably want to add comparable info on current schools. I'm wondering if we should plan on splitting up this page, because it's getting big and will get bigger. Also, if anyone has ideas for a more uniform treatment of schools, and of which schools deserve individual articles, I'd be glad to discuss. - Jmabel | Talk 08:02, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
I've now added those former schools of which I am aware. Previous comments still apply. - Jmabel | Talk 06:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Frank B. Cooper

Frank B. Cooper deserves an article of his own. The book by Richard C. Berner that I cited to mention him has quite a bit of useful, relevant material. - Jmabel | Talk 02:06, 27 January 2008 (UTC)