Talk:Seann William Scott
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to actors and filmmakers on Wikipedia. | ||
 |
It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality. Note: Wikipedia's non-free content use policy almost never permits the use of non-free images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead. |
[edit] Cite sources, please
I don't understand why uncited information and a vague citation of "People Magazine" are valid sources for an encyclopedia entry, but comments made by the person referenced in the article during a verbal interview are not. In the very least, the "Personal Life" section should be removed until specific citations are entered verifying its validity.M0unds 06:58, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
In the given reference, SWS did not say "Wikipedia sucks", but "These other jobs sucks" (he was speaking about jobs he did before 'making films'). It is exactly at the end of the video extract. --74.58.74.112 20:42, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Actually he did say "Wikipedia sucks", they were talking about the above mentioned "People Magazine" entries that once appeared on this page. Please don't try to quote something you didn't hear. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.17.147 (talk) 18:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Well, supply the EXACT reference then. The 'reference previously supplied' was about an interview, on video, that someone supplied as a proof that SWS said "wikipedia sucks", and, as I pointed out, he didn't, in that then-supplied reference. Again, if you have a reference, supply it, else, it is only a hear-say. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.58.74.112 (talk) 15:18, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Multiple UNDO on exterior link(s)
Seems there is some vandalism or misunderstanding going on about exterior links. I removed one that was unrelated and since then, have to undo other link removal of a valid link (seannscott.net) on multiple occasions. Vandalism or fighting against an user wanting to push his (her) unrelated link?
To be clear, in case some confusion is the problem:
I removed http://jacksonme.livejournal.com
while http://seanscott.net is valid
That last reference is sometimes vandalized to seannwscott.net, which is dead (not existing). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.58.74.112 (talk) 19:33, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
The http://seanscott.net site is not a personal site, it is made of contributions by many persons, supplying related materials, and free of access.
[edit] Darwinek, can you READ?
Hey, you asked for details and I supplied them, right here, up, there, but it seems you never read it. So, to make it clear:
I removed an unrelated link, then after I did that, I spot that another EXISTING link was dead/corrupted, I modified it.
Then, someone did remove that link too! I re-insert it, you remove it, I re-insert it, your removed it, asking reasons, *** I SUPPLIED THE REASONS***, but from all evidence, you NEVER READ THEM!
Does that mean you will bann ANYONE who will try to re-insert that LEGITIMATE link? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.228.178.102 (talk) 23:27, 24 April 2008 (UTC) And when you say: "Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia." In AFTER HOW MUCH TIME could we be able to re-insert the legitimate link? Have you an answer to that? Do YOU READ what you ASK US to write? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.228.178.102 (talk) 23:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
