Talk:Seaborgium

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Chemistry Portal This article is supported by the Elements WikiProject, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details. This article has also been selected for the Version 0.5 release of Wikipedia.
	This article is also supported by WikiProject Chemistry.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements. Elementbox converted 10:27, 15 July 2005 by Femto (previous revision was that of 07:20, 25 June 2005).

[edit] Pronunciation

Dorky question: The name Seaborg ends in a hard G, but usually a G followed by and I is a soft G (like a J). I've always wondered, is the element pronounced as Seabor(hard G)ium, or Seabor(soft G)ium? Is either pronunciation acceptable? EDIT yes both are acceptable... considering most of the facts about this element are unknown

Seaborgium is pronounced with a hard G in order to firmly indicate the association with seaborg. Listen to the audio file for pronunciation.--Drjezza (talk) 14:51, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Half-Life

There is conflicting data about half-lives in the article itself: In the introduction there is "most stable isotope 271Sg has a half-life of 2.4 minutes" and in the "Isotopes" section there is "longest-lived isotope is 269Sg [...] has a half-life of 22 s". The latter data seems to be outdated.

IAEA says that the isotope 272Sg has got a half-life of 1 hour, but I don't know what the italic remark "SY" means on IAEA's site. Icek 13:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

SY there means the value is theoretically derived from systematic trends and has not been verified experimentally. See also isotopes of seaborgium and talk:isotopes of seaborgium for some reference data. Much of the isotope-related text in the articles dates back to when these pages weren't available, you're right that someone should update it. Femto 15:37, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

I think the problem has been fixed - thanks for spotting it! Walkerma 09:12, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Not really. It might just as well be 272 but it's unconfirmed. With inconclusive data like this the article should avoid definite statements like "the most stable" or "longest". Femto 11:50, 5 September 2006 (UTC)