User talk:ScottThornbury

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, ScottThornbury, and welcome to Wikipedia! Wikipedia is one of the world's fastest growing internet sites. We aim to build the biggest and most comprehensive encyclopaedia in the world! To date we have over four million articles in a host of languages. The English language Wikipedia alone has 1,465,293 articles! But we still need more! Please feel free to contribute your knowledge and expertise to our site.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Also, don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! It might be a good idea to read this to see how you can avoid making common mistakes, though.

Just to give you a really basic overview so you don't make any mistakes early:

  1. Wikipedia keeps a neutral point of view policy, meaning that all contributions must not be biased one way or the other. Even if both biases are presented, it is still not allowed on Wikipedia.
  2. Only public domain resources can be copied directly to Wikipedia without permission — this does not include most web pages.
  3. Be bold! In my opinion, this may be Wikipedia's most important policy. Go ahead and edit a page! Don't worry about "ruining" other's work, this is a wiki! (Of course, major changes should probably be proposed on talk pages to achieve consensus, but don't be scared!)

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please always sign your name on talk pages (but not articles!) using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the time and date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —Mets501 (talk) 03:22, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyrighted material

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

Feel free to re-submit a new version of the article. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I irrevocably release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, for use on Wikipedia and elsewhere."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. —Mets501 (talk) 03:22, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome, Scott

I am aware of your work with Dogme and am glad you have joined the active community of Wikipedia. I should point out, however, that it is considered bad form to start an article on yourself or anything closely connected (one's own corporation, for example). So the Dogme ELT article may be criticised by other editors on these grounds. Personally, I'm glad you started it, or at any rate glad that it now exists. But I would suggest that, to fit in with the Wikipedia ethos, you sit back and let it grow, and not edit it yourself unless glaring factual errors creep in. On the other hand, your eyes on TEFL and English language learning and teaching will be most welcome and Wiki-appropriate! Good luck with finding your feet here! If I can help, post a message to my talk page. BrainyBabe 17:54, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

– Chris53516 (Talk) 18:03, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Please see this policy: Wikipedia:Editors who may have a conflict of interest – Chris53516 (Talk) 18:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Do NOT add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. See this policy: Wikipedia:External links. – Chris53516 (Talk) 17:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Why did you change the references? Do these references even discuss the material in the page, or are they just additional studies? Did you even use these references in writing the article? – Chris53516 (Talk) 17:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
The references were chosen because they are both leading textboooks in the field, and their mentions of Dogme validate it as a signifcant development in the field. ScottThornbury 18:07, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
According to Webster, a reference is "a source of information (as a book or passage) to which a reader or consulter is referred". If you did not use those in writing the article, they are not references, but additional material for people to read. – Chris53516 (Talk) 18:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Summary box

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Chris53516 (Talk) 17:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dogme ELT Deletion Review

Hi Scott,

Can you give me the rundown on what this article is saying, possibly scan it for me if you have the time? here Malangthon 04:54, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi Thom, I'm sorry I didn't get back to you on this (it's now early April) but I haven't been checking Wikipedia much since the Dogme entry was axed. The ELT Journal article titled Dogme is in fact not so much about Dogme per se as about the implications of a dogme-style approach to the teaching of global issues _ it is a summmarised version of an online discussion (in which I was the guest "speaker"), run by the IATEFL Global Issues Special Interest Group. If you are still interested I can scan you a copy (or maybe let you access the article online using my ELT J membership log in - if I can locate it. Hope this helps. ScottThornbury 16:50, 5 April 2007 (UTC)