From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard. |
|
An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information. |
|
This project provides a central approach to Intelligent design-related subjects on Wikipedia.
Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
|
Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. |
Mid |
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
|
[edit] Kansas Kangaroo Court
From the article:
- "he has also testified on behalf of intelligent design advocates in a case involving the Kansas Board of Education (http://jgrr.blogspot.com/2005/04/who-are-these-people.html)
Except he didn't :-> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/kansas/kangaroo.html
The question is therefre did he intend to?
Gotta love the subtle negative slant every ID proponent is dealt in their write ups...ridiculous.
- Given the hammering that the credibility of Minnich's support for ID received in Kitzmiller v. Dover, a subtle negative slant is hardly necessary. Hrafn42 10:59, 12 May 2007 (UTC)