Talk:Scott Ludlam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Portal	Scott Ludlam is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Scott Ludnam elected

This article keeps changing Ludnam's senate elect status. I previously wrote "he had been elected". Someone changed that to "provisionally elected". Today, someone else changed it to "predicted to be elected". Even though the last few overseas postal votes are yet to come in, there is no chance of Ludnam losing. His numbers are safe. Every major news organisation in Australia says he was elected. Example, Murdoch pressand Fairfax This article should join the news media and say he was elected.--Lester 20:22, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

I changed it back... let's hope Rebecca, and everyone else, will finally leave it alone. Enough time has passed, I'd say... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.250.105 (talk) 22:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

I don't see how anyone can say he's been elected already..... i haven't finished counting the votes yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.161.89.170 (talk) 08:15, 10 December 2007 (UTC)