Talk:SCons

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is this going to be like emerge? --Terrible Tim 21:21, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

They're two completely different beasts, SCons attempts to be an all-in-one tool while Portage is a front-end to many programs. --ren 19:49, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Neutrality

Next-generation, improved, easier, more reliable, faster... It sounds really like a Neutral POV [/sarcasm] --ren 19:52, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Ren, I've updated the article to make it NPOV, I hope. Please take a look at it and see what you think; if you like it, then please remove your pov tag. --Andy 9 November 2005

I'd say, after the edits by 130.164.71.111 this is now NPOV, so I removed the tag. --Allefant 16:02, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Built in support

From the article:

"Automatic dependency analysis built-in for C, C++ and Fortran."

and then:

"Built-in support for C, C++, D, Java, Fortran, Objective-C, Yacc, Lex, Qt and SWIG, and building TeX and LaTeX documents. Other languages or file types can be supported through user-defined Builders for other languages or file types."

Does that mean that D, Java, Objective-C, Yacc, Lex, Qt, SWIG and LaTeX are not fully supported?

Well, in the Java case, I guess the dependency is deduced by the compiler but what about the other languages/tools? don't they need dependency analysis?Ori 19:43, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

The features listed are from http://scons.org - so best ask there I guess. --Allefant (talk) 10:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)