User talk:Sciencewatcher

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives

/Archive 1

[edit] Nice edits

I'm enjoying reading your well-reasoned analysis of articles that the alternative medicine types throw into articles. Welcome aboard. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 05:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Although sometimes inactive, I think Sciencewatcher is one of the best pseudoscience editors on wikipeida. Cool Hand Luke 18:08, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

I hope you mean he's one of the best science editors on Wikipedia, and he also brings critical balance to psuedoscientific articles.  :) Actually, haven't seen him until yesterday. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 18:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, that's what I mean. (I didn't want to write "anti-pseudoscience" because editor follows reliable sources to ensure that pseudoscientific topics are written from a neutral point of view.) Cool Hand Luke 18:19, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments. Keep up the good work.--Sciencewatcher (talk) 20:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] POV tag

The original tag was placed by Guido den Broeder. I was just moving it because a large tag was placed halfway through the section. I have no idea why the POV tag was originally placed. JamesStewart7 (talk) 04:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

The tag was placed because the bottom part of the section was not supported by the references. I have corrected that. Guido den Broeder (talk) 18:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Let me know...

if you receive more personal attacks like these. That sort of behavior cannot be allowed to continue. E4043 (talk · contribs) also made this edit today, FYI. — Scientizzle 15:36, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for noticing this and reverting it. I have never heard of Steven Novella. It's funny what goes on in some people's heads. --Sciencewatcher (talk) 17:36, 8 April 2008 (UTC)