Talk:ScienTOMogy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	ScienTOMogy has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
Article milestones Date Process Result November 1, 2007 Good article nominee Listed November 7, 2007 Articles for deletion Kept November 28, 2007 Peer review Reviewed Current Status: Good article

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ScienTOMogy article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability
Archives: 1, 2

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details

The Arbitration Committee has placed all Scientology-related articles on probation (see relevant arbitration case). Editors making disruptive edits may be banned by an administrator from this and related articles, or other reasonably related pages. Scientology Portal This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) ScienTOMogy is part of WikiProject New Zealand, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. Internet Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the Internet culture. For more information, visit the project page. GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Society Portal This article is part of WikiProject Media, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to media. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Comedy Portal This article is within the scope of the Comedy WikiProject, which collaborates on articles related to comedy, comics, comedians, comedy movies, and the like. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

[edit] GA passed

1. Well written? Yes; I found no major problems (although I corrected a few things as I read through it).
2. Factually accurate and verifiable? Seems to be fine; good use of inline citations and the {{cite}} templates.
3. Broad in its coverage? Yes.
4. Neutral? Yes.
5. Stable? Yes. Looks like Cirt has done some extensive editing recently, but no edit wars and nothing to cause concern.
6. Illustrated? Only one picture, but it's pretty hard to illustrate a website; that's about as good as one can expect. If you could find a free image of Tom Cruise or something (especially if it was of him jumping on the couch, though I can't imagine those broadcast snapshots would be free), that would be nice.

Some thoughts/recommendations as I was reading through:

• Is the "W" in "web site" capitalized? Seeing it capitalized struck me as a bit odd. But I have no idea what MoS says, and this is just my own thought/preference.
• As "Church of Scientology" is a proper noun, should "the church" be "the Church" ? Again, just me.

Good work! Dylan 05:46, 2 November 2007 (UTC) Thank you!

1. I always thought it was capitalized, but looking at the Wikipedia article for Web site, looks like one could go either way stylistically, just so long as its uniform throughout the article.
2. You are correct, it should be capitalized. I will look for this and correct it. Cirt 05:48, 2 November 2007 (UTC).

• Y Done - Forgot to note I went and corrected that. Cirt 04:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC).