Scientists and Engineers for America
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Scientists and Engineers for America | |
Smart Leadership for a Change |
|
Type of Organization | 501(c)(3) Nonprofit Advocacy Group |
Headquarters | Washington, D.C. |
Location | U.S.A. |
Membership | 7,100 |
---|---|
Executive Director | Lesley Stone |
Date Formed | September 27, 2006 |
Official Website | www.sefora.org |
Scientists and Engineers for America (SEA) is an organization focused on promoting sound science in American government, and supporting candidates who understand science and its applications. SEA was formed on September 27, 2006, and describes itself as non-partisan.
SEA is organized as a 501(c)(3) organization, and represents a reorganization of Scientists and Engineers for Change, an organization founded in 2004 to support the election of John Kerry. [1] Its current executive director is Lesley Stone. SEA operates a wiki site titled the Science, Health And Related Policies (SHARP) Network, which allows members to track and contribute information on congressional representatives, candidates, and science policy issues. SEA is associated with a 501(c)(4) organization known as the SEA Action Fund.[2].
Contents |
[edit] Political positions
[edit] Bill of Rights for Scientists and Engineers
A bill of rights which outlines the principles of the organization states:[3]
“ |
|
” |
[edit] Mission statement
The organization's mission statement states:[4]
“ | We envision a future where wise science and technology policy can help every American live in a safe and clean environment, enjoy good health and education, and benefit from a strong system of national defense. Scientists and Engineers for America is the only national organization dedicated exclusively to advancing these goals through the electoral process...
Our mission is to renew respect for evidence-based debate and decision-making in politics and at all levels of government. SEA's mission incorporates four main elements: educating the public about science policy issues, educating members of the scientific community about the political process and ways in which they can effectively participate in elections, influencing elected officials, and ultimately holding politicians accountable through the dissemination of accurate and timely information about the positions they take on science issues. |
” |
[edit] Programs
[edit] SHARP Network
The Science, Health and Related Policies Network is a wiki to track congressional representatives, senators, and candidates as well as presidential candidates.
[edit] Elections Education and Training
The Elections Education and Training project is a workshop aimed at training science-oriented professionals to run for public office.
[edit] Board of Advisers
Among others, the SEA Board of Advisers includes noted Nobel Laureates such as:[5].
[edit] Criticism
Soon after its foundation, the organization was accused of partisanship by several conservative media outlets. Wesley J. Smith, senior fellow of the Discovery Institute, wrote in The Weekly Standard:
“ | When critics bemoan the politicization of science, they usually point a bitter finger at the Bush administration. Their condemnation should actually be aimed in the opposite direction. Increasingly, it is the scientists themselves--or better stated the leaders of the science sector--who are devolving science from the apolitical pursuit of knowledge into a distinctly ideological enterprise.[6] | ” |
An editorial in The Wall Street Journal criticised the organization for seeming to stifle scientific dissent:
“ | That is one reason why it is always dismaying when scientists -- of all people -- suggest that on some subjects there must be no questioning because debate is closed. And on one level, at least, this would seem to be the implicit message of the newly formed 527 political organization called Scientists and Engineers for America, or SEA.[7] | ” |
In a rebuttal posted on the SEA website, founding executive director Michael Brown stated:
“ | Nothing could be further from the truth. As one who is familiar with SEA and its mission, I must confess that I had to read the editorial three or four times before I had any idea what it was talking about. In fact, it was not until I re-read the Weekly Standard article that I understood the “debate” we were allegedly closing. This is the debate about whether scientists and engineers should engage in public policy and actively address the misuse and politicization of science or whether they should remain silent when their voices are censured, their findings are misused, and scientific integrity itself is attacked. This is a debate that is open, ongoing---and that we join with enthusiasm.[8] | ” |
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- ^ Science 2006, Seed Magazine, October 6, 2006
- ^ SEA Action Fund, March 4, 2008
- ^ Bill of Rights for Scientists and Engineers, SEA Website, February 19, 2008
- ^ SEA Mission Statement, SEA Website, February 19, 2008
- ^ Board of Advisors, SEA Website. March 4, 2008
- ^ A new political action committee enters the fray, The Weekly Standard, October 5, 2006
- ^ Under the Microscope, The Wall Street Journal, October 6, 2006
- ^ Look who's talking, SEA Website, January 16, 2007