User talk:Schweiwikist

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, Schweiwikist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! NorseOdin 18:37, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] reply

Thanks!

---schweiwikist

[edit] Apology

Sorry, Schweiwikist, I had to edit your posting to the Roger Rabbit talk page. The title should be abbreviated as WFRR without a question mark. The people who created the film went to some trouble to make sure that there would be no question mark. You know how toons are.LestradeLestrade

[edit] schwei’s reply

No big deal...I recomposed the question “in the form of a question” ;) Schweiwikist 13:26, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies filmography was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 21:45, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Sandbox/Wikistory (Sentence)

Brookie here - you might be interested in the above, which has just started! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 06:57, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

No and neither is Wikistory - but we all need something light! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 13:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hugo Weisgall edit

I am puzzled by your edit of The Stronger (opera) (which actually should have been The Stronger). What was the reason for this? Editing red links is unusual. Regards. - Kleinzach 19:29, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining, however while The Stronger (opera) is evidently correct, I think The Stronger (play) should really be The Stronger. Anyway that's up to you as I'm not involved in the latter. Best. - Kleinzach 19:54, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edits to WP:D

Yes, I am sorry that we all seemed to be editing right at the same time, it did make for a bit of a confusing mess. As far as I'd seen, I didn't think all of your edits got reverted, just some of the bolding and other stylistic things. Some of your copyediting and rephrasing was quite helpful, and I believe it's all still there. Some of the bolding just made the page a bit too busy. As for the other edits, if you think they are helpful, definitly bring them up on the talk page. In general, if you're going to make more than minor changes, that's the best place to bring them up, so that everyone can agree on them, and not have reverting issues. -- Nataly a 18:53, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Schweiwikist/subpage/DisambigPurpose

Deleted as requested. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] TOETAG

Why/how is this a useful shortcut? I don't understand how it is clearer than {{db-redirnone}}, which is easily readable also in the deletion log. If you tag a redirect with TOETAG, I have to add an extra reason when deleting. Kusma (討論) 19:34, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Well, WP:CSD#R1's are pretty obvious even without an explanation. I don't mind your using of your personal shortcut all that much, but I have removed the shortcut tag from the template, because I don't think it should be advertised or used more widely. Redirects to empty pages should always be deleted no matter if they have incoming links or not, so I don't see why an extra tag for those would be useful. Kusma (討論) 19:58, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] wikEd

Hi, I have seen that you are using the Cacycle editor extension. This program is no longer actively maintained in favor of its much more powerful successor wikEd.

wikEd has all the functionality of the old editor plus:• syntax highlighting • nifty image buttons • morefixing buttons • paste formatted text from Word or web pages• convert the formatted text into wikicode • adjustthe font size • and much, much more.

Switching to wikEd is easy, check the detailed installation description on its project homepage. Usually it is as simple as changing every occurrence of editor.js into wikEd.js on your User:YourUsername/monobook.js page.

Cacycle 21:51, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I think I have fixed the Mac OS X problems, please check User talk:Cacycle/wikEd :-) Cacycle 05:11, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mac OS X

Hi Schweiwikist,

I might have found a solution for the wikEd problems under Mac OS X. Please could you do me a big faver and test it. Please click SHIFT-Reload to update, the privacy purge might not work (the version displayed by hovering over the wikEd logo at the top of the page should be 0.9.4).

Thanks in advance, Cacycle 03:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Hey Schweiwikist, thanks for your effort. Coincidentally, the MediaWiki developers had renamed a page element (editpage-copywarn2 to editpage-copywarn2.3B), and that was what has caused the loading error. I have just fixed it.

The multiple 0.9.4 versions do differ only in minor details completely unrelated to the Mac OS X problems. I had to do some online testing, no need for sub-versions in this case. I will continue to increment the last number for every real new submit.

Good to hear that the scrollbar issue is fixed! Are those other related symptons also fixed?

Thanks, Cacycle 14:44, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template:JanuaryCalendar2007Source

Hello, I noticed you recently changed the month on this template from "January" to the abbreviated "Jan", as this was messing with the newly created 2007 TFA archive, I've changed it back and am here to inform you that I've done so. Just now, I was creating the 2007 today's featured article archives (Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 2007) and as it turns out, the abbreviation of January in the template was messing with format used for TFA archives, which are, of course, the templates used for the main page. Basically, the main template read January 1, as it should, but because the calendar template was abbreviated Jan, then when you clicked on a day in the calendar (not the templates themselves) it would take you to Wikipedia:Today's featured article/Jan 1, 2007 instead of Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 1, 2007. Now, I'm not sure why you abbreviated January, maybe there was a reason for it, so I've come here to inform you that I changed it back for this purpose (in case there's a reason for changing it to Jan), if there was, then please inform me so that we can work together in figuring out how to fix it, if not then, well, at least reply so I know you got the messahe, lol. Thanks -- SmthManly / ^ManlyTalk / ^{ManlyContribs} 00:00, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Heh, no problem then. I had no idea why you had done it, so I wanted to make sure I wasn't changing something you did for a good reason (perhaps you needed Jan instead of January for a certain page), and that's why I contacted you first. It's all fixed now, and the first 3 months of TFA archives are filled in and ready, so that's good to go. I may do more of them later, but adding the TFAempty template 365 times is tiresome, so I may just keep it this way until February or so then go for the next three after that. Anywho, that is all! -- SmthManly / ^ManlyTalk / ^{ManlyContribs} 07:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] wikEd help

Cool idea, thanks! Cacycle 17:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Please could you upload the images to the Mediawiki Commons and add the following text adapted to your needs as a description. With this text you don't have to chose a license from the input box.

* '''Description:''' image for the Mediawiki JavaScript editor [[w:User:Cacycle/wikEd|wikEd]] help page
* '''Author:''' [[w:User_talk:Schweiwikist|Schweiwikist]]
* '''Date of creation:''' September 14, 2006 (UTC)
* '''Source:''' selfmade
* '''Copyright:'''<br>released into the Public Domain
* '''Comments:'''<br>16x48 px PNG images with transparent background, made with PhotoShop and IrfanView

[[Category:wikEd]]
{{PD-self}}

Cacycle 18:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:WikEdFormButt.png

Thanks for uploading Image:WikEdFormButt.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:13, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Redirects List of African athletes

Hello, apparently you have made many redirects from African athletes to List of African athletes. Those were formerly red links, but appear now as blue ones. I dont see it useful at all, instead a bit irritating. Red links are more useful, as they instantly tell non-existence of the article. Julius Sahara 19:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank for creating a list of the athletes in question. I'm not going to delete those redirects (and even can't since I'm not an admin). Some of them were already on my to do-list, so preferably I'll upgrade all of them into specific articles some day Julius Sahara 20:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

I will help. Punkmorten 22:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Redirects that aren't useful

The other day, I was creating an article about a song, and got cut off because I ran out of time (I use public-access computers, with strict time limits enforced by software!) I had created several redirects to that page because the references from many pages were to slightly different forms uf the title. Apparently, you came along, redirected the missing article to a totally unreasonable place, and then decided (to avoid double redirects) to send the other redirects to that same unreasonable place. Please don't do that sort of thing again. I create a lot of articles on songs, and there are a lot of variants of song titles, so I make redirects so the references will all go to the same place. If I don't get quite finished when I run out of time, they will end up as articles to a nonexistent article. If you just wait a day or two, that will be cleared up! Sending each of those redirects to some other article, which isn't even an appropriate place for the redirect to go, just so you avoid redirects to nonexistent articles, only makes more work for me and does nothing to help Wikipedia users who get redirected to someplace that does not give them any useful information. If you want to to something useful in such a situation, just send me a message to remind me to create the article! -- BRG 15:20, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 60 minutes

Did you watch 60 minutes tonight? I just noticed you made the entry for Jay Greenberg on the blue jay page.

Anonymous user at 66.160.113.138 (t|c) 21:09 26 November, 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Corresp with tariqabjotu 11/30/06

[edit] Admin-warming gift

An early ~~holiday~~ birthday* gift for you has been placed under the tree here, for your review. I'm fascinated with the work that goes into the various calendars, etc. on WP, and used your August into September Current Events cal edit to come up with tomorrow's calendar (Dec 1, they almost match, since September also started on a Friday). It's quite a superb design that I understand you came up with. If this re-fit looks right, just copy and paste. Glad to help in a timely fashion, and see you next month perhaps, if not sooner ;) !

*Just missed Election Day, I see. Best wishes anyway!

Schweiwikist (talk) 20:20, 30 November 2006 (updated-corrected) (UTC)

Wonderful! One minor correction though... back in early September, the archive sub-pages were at Portal:Current events/Month year. They have since been moved to just Month year (e.g. November 2006), so that should be corrected. But, overall, I'm glad someone else has been able to decipher the monthly update (see also: Portal:Current events/How to archive the portal). -- tariqabjotu 22:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:RobHooDfy.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:RobHooDfy.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 22:55, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:EYegsTC.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:EYegsTC.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chris B • talk 11:36, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hello

David, I was just editing your "page" so I thought I'd stop by and say hi. --JHP (talk) 07:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Annabethschott6x17.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Annabethschott6x17.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Back to the Future timeline

An editor has nominated Back to the Future timeline, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back to the Future timeline (3rd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)