User talk:Schwael

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

hello! i'm new.  :)

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them:

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Tip: you can sign your name with ~~~~

Dori | Talk 00:40, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)

Sounds good, go for it, we usually call it the References section though. Dori | Talk 00:54, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Walla Walla Massacre

This is a wonderful idea. I have found it best to type my article in a word processor and then put it on Wikipedia.

Sometimes if you have more than one source for your article it is better. Read the article(s), make notes, then write it in your own words. Believe me you will have lots of suggestions for ways of making it better very quickly.

Happy writing.

Robbie Giles 00:01, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)

  • You make my librarian heart go pitty-pat. Way to go!

Robbie Giles 07:02, Feb 2, 2005 (UTC)

Left you a question at Talk:Walla Walla Massacre (in case you haven't got it in your watchlist. Dori | Talk 05:24, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Talk page

Congratiulations with your talk page ;-P Don't hesitate to ask, we love to help ✏ Sverdrup 21:24, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Go EC, GO!!

Hi Liz, I am sure you will recognize me from my username, and the stuff I write about. Cool to see another Earlhamite here!!! Cheers!Themalau 11:30, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America Newsletter - July '06

The Indigenous Peoples of North America Portal has been established, as a starting point for those wishing to learn more about the subject, with information and links on a wide variety of issues. It also contains news regarding the continent's various tribes and nations. It's a graphically pleasing site, and everyone is encouraged to check it out.
The project's home page has a new design, featuring tabbed subpages on participants, templates, articles, categories, and the to do list.
The Article Classification lists have been moved to their own subpage due to size. This is a sign of progress in the ongoing work of this project.
The project's talk page template has been updated, along with the classification system, to include the assessment on the talk pages of the articles that have been classified and assessed.
Balance
As the Project reaches its first six months of activity, the great effort all of you have invested in it has turned the vast information available on Indigenous North American topics from a deorganized cumulous into an excellent and easy to consult database. Although much work is still in order, few WikiProjects are able to obtain the amazing results we are proud to show today. To all of you, thank you and congratulations!
The assessment of articles within the scope of the project is still an ongoing process. We need people to help in this who are not contributors to the articles they are assessing. Also, there is the ongoing need for identifying and cataloguing articles that fall within the scope of this project. As of today, nearly 1,500 have been identified within the Project's scope.
Signed by
Aaron Walden & Phaedriel - 15:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Les jeux sont faits

I was hoping for a separate article about the film. My pet project is films based on books/plays etc. I moved the split tag to make that clearer, and maybe someday a kind soul (who has seen the film) will wander by. <g> Cheers! ♥ Her Pegship♥ 02:37, 8 September 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Race and intelligence

It's great to have fresh voice in this debate-- it's been driving me a little buggy. OR stands for "original research" something that isn't allowed here per the rules.

I think you did a good job of outlining the current dispute-- I'll be interested to know what the other editors think. futurebird 22:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Race and Genetics

Okay, I'll look in to this. By the way, I voted yes for the merger since the article Race and multilocus allele clusters is also in need of context, and it will be easier to do this with everything in one place. futurebird 16:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Emancipation Oak

Thanks for the kind words. The information came from this website: Hampton University Emancipation Oak —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaoverland (talk • contribs) 16:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks and Happy New Year

Firstly, let me wish you a very happy New Year and thank you for your help in the Milhist Tag & Assess 2007 drive.

Secondly, although the Tag & Assess 2007 drive is now officially closed, you are very welcome to continue tagging and assessing until 31 January 2008. Any articles you tag and assess during this time will be credited fully to your tagging tally for further award purposes.

Thirdly, if you can find the time, it would be great to have your feedback/comments and participation in the recently-set-up Tag & Assess workshop The idea is to see what lessons we can learn from the 2007 drive to make the 2008 one more efficient and enjoyable.

Thanks again for your help, --ROGER DAVIES talk 10:46, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Danger and Beauty Book.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Danger and Beauty Book.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] News! Tag & Assess 2008 is coming ...

Milhist's new drive – Tag & Assess 2008 – goes live on April 25 and you are cordially invited to participate. This time, the task is housekeeping. As ever, there are awards galore, plus there's a bit of friendly competition built-in, with a race for bronze, silver and gold wikis! You can sign up, in advance, here. I look forward to seeing you on the drive page! All the best, --ROGER DAVIES talk 13:18, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

One Stripe (200 articles)
Two Stripes (400 articles)
Three Stripes (600 articles)
Tireless Contributor Barnstar (1000 articles)
Chevrons (2000 articles)
Working Man's Barnstar (3000 articles)
Barnstar of Diligence (4000 articles)
Third place overall
Second place overall
First place overall