User talk:Scholor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Welcome!
Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or ask the people around you for help -- good Wikipedians don't bite the newcomers. Keep an open mind and listen for advice, but don't hesitate to be bold when editing! If you'd like to respond to this message, or ask any questions, feel free to leave a message at my talk page! Once you've become a more experienced Wikipedian, you may wish to take a moment to visit these pages: Best of luck to you, and happy editing! Luna Santin 06:57, 2 September 2006 (UTC) |
Dear Scholor, certain events on Wikipedia involving you compell me to inform you of the follwing WP:3RR, which I adivse you to read and digest. Thank you. Str1977 (smile back) 15:23, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] You're breaking the rules
You're violating the three revert rule. Also, the material you're adding has serious issues of no sources and bias. A.J.A. 15:25, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- You've already broken the three-revert rule. Please make yourself completely familiar with that rule as soons as possible, using the link that Str1977 and A.J.A have given you. In particular, bear in mind that partial reverts count, as do reverts that are made at the same time as insertion of something new. Even if you don't make the page identical to what it was before, if there's something you keep adding, or something you keep removing, then adding or removing part of it, with or without changing something else, will count as making a revert, and could lead to you being blocked for 24 hours (or longer for repeat offences). AnnH ♫ 15:31, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- And when you've finished reading WP:3RR, I suggest you read WP:SOCK. Not a good idea to try to get round the rules that way. Puppetry is regarded with a high level of distaste here on Wikipedia. It can do a lot of harm to your reputation, and can lead to much longer blocks than a simple 3RR violation. AnnH ♫ 15:51, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism accusations
Please stop referring to edits you disagree with as "vandalism". I suggest you read this page, where it says that "Abusive edit summaries are particularly ill-regarded." We're prepared to make some allowances because you're new, but already you've violated the three-revert rule, you've engaged in massive edit warring, you've used sockpuppets to try to get your version of the article, you've ignored consensus, and now you're engaging in personal attacks in your edit summaries. You've likely to get blocked if this continues, so please think carefully before you resume editing. Thanks. AnnH ♫ 20:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
