User talk:Schmoopster
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Take this to the Prostatitis talk page. Do not break the rules by entering an edit war. Skopp (Talk) 04:36, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] A little (unasked) advice
It is a good practice to sign talk pages using four tildes like this ~~~~. Helps you follow a conversation more easily. And your comments on Talk:Prostatitis do border on personal attacks and are not civil. Better watch out. Cheers. - TwoOars (T | C) 02:06, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- This comment makes no sense. First, every comment I've left has my signature applied to it. Second, there is a LONG history with that poster who has every motive to hide factual information. I am happy to inform you on this sordid history if you're interested. I have asked for mediation of this dispute.Schmoopster 02:37, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- I have no long history with anyone. Are you affiliated with the prostatitis foundation? It seems you must be, and you've joined WP simply to add this link. This is clearly unacceptable; you need to check the rules. As for the foundation, a full description of the organisation can be found here. I think that clearly sums up why the inclusion of the link is inappropriate. The material presented by Unit5 is also germane (see Prostatitis Talk page). Skopp (Talk) 04:36, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- About your signatures: This is what I am talking about. Even if you change something later, all the edits done to a page can be seen in the Page history. I checked the site in question and at first glance the site is not all that bad but I can't tell if it is fit to be there in the article. And I am not interested in the sordid history of any editor. I just said your comments on that talk page were not civil, because they were not. Thanks. - TwoOars (T | C) 02:51, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- I see that you added your signature almost immediately after the bot did. Anyway the bit about your signature was just a friendly suggestion, nothing more. Cheers. - TwoOars (T | C) 04:26, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- This comment makes no sense. First, every comment I've left has my signature applied to it. Second, there is a LONG history with that poster who has every motive to hide factual information. I am happy to inform you on this sordid history if you're interested. I have asked for mediation of this dispute.Schmoopster 02:37, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Do not blank your talk page.
Please do not blank your user talk page. Your user talk page does not belong to you, it belongs to the Wikimedia Foundation. (see WP:TALK) If you blank and/or vandalise this page in the future, you could be blocked from editing without prior notice. Skopp (Talk) 22:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC) |