Schoen-Yau conjecture

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In mathematics, the Schoen-Yau conjecture is a disproved conjecture in hyperbolic geometry, named after the mathematicians Richard Schoen and Shing-Tung Yau.

It was inspired by a theorem of Erhard Heinz (1952). One method of disproof is the use of Scherk surfaces, as used by Harold Rosenberg and Pascal Collin (2006).

[edit] Setting and statement of the conjecture

Let \mathbb{C} be the complex plane considered as a Riemannian manifold with its usual (flat) Riemannian metric. Let \mathbb{H} denote the hyperbolic plane, i.e. the unit disc

\mathbb{H} := \{ (x, y) \in \mathbb{R}^{2} | x^{2} + y^{2} < 1 \}

endowed with the hyperbolic metric

\mathrm{d}s^2 = 4 \frac{\mathrm{d} x^{2} + \mathrm{d} y^{2}}{(1 - (x^{2} + y^{2}))^2}.

E. Heinz proved in 1952 that there can exist no harmonic diffeomorphism

f : \mathbb{H} \to \mathbb{C}.

In light of this theorem, Schoen conjectured that there exists no harmonic diffeomorphism

g : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{H}.

(It is not clear how Yau's name became associated with the conjecture: in unpublished correspondence with Harold Rosenberg, both Schoen and Yau identify Schoen as having postulated the conjecture). The Schoen(-Yau) conjecture has since been disproved.

[edit] Comments

It should be noted that the emphasis is on the existence or non-existence of an harmonic diffeomorphism, and that this property is a "one-way" property. In more detail: suppose that we consider two Riemannian manifolds M and N (with their respective metrics), and write

M \sim N\,

if there exists a diffeomorphism from M onto N (in the usual terminology, M and N are diffeomorphic). Write

M \propto N

if there exists an harmonic diffeomorphism from M onto N. It is not difficult to show that \sim (being diffeomorphic) is an equivalence relation on the objects of the category of Riemannian manifolds. In particular, \sim is a symmetric relation:

M \sim N \iff N \sim M.

It can be shown that the hyperbolic plane and (flat) complex plane are indeed diffeomorphic:

\mathbb{H} \sim \mathbb{C},

so the question is whether or not they are "harmonically diffeomorphic". However, as the truth of Heinz's theorem and the falsity of the Schoen-Yau conjecture demonstrate, \propto is not a symmetric relation:

\mathbb{C} \propto \mathbb{H} \mbox{ but } \mathbb{H} \not \propto \mathbb{C}.

Thus, being "harmonically diffeomorphic" is a much stronger property than simply being diffeomorphic, and can be a "one-way" relation.

[edit] References

  • Heinz, Erhard (1952). "Über die Lösungen der Minimalflächengleichung". Nachr. Akad. Wiss. Göttingen. Math.-Phys. Kl. Math.-Phys.-Chem. Abt. 1952: 51–56.