Talk:Scenic Railway (Dreamland)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Status
I have changed the status from 'Destroyed' to 'SBNO'. Sections of the ride have been destroyed, other elements have been damaged by the fire. A large portion of the ride remains standing, therefore I don't think 'Destroyed' is appropriate. Feel free to discuss if you disagree. PMBO (talk) 23:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
- Having read the SBNO definition, it doesn't really seem to fit. I think 'Partially Destroyed' may be more appropriate? OwainDavies (about)(talk) edited at 16:12, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
I think this article should be redone when i type in scenic railway it should come up with the australian one it is older and has a world record.
[edit] past tense?
The article describes the scenic railway in the past tense, but given it is only 1/3rd destroyed isn't it premature to write it off? Pgr94 (talk) 10:16, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- As above, I think with the ride partially destroyed, the tense is probably past until some evidence is shown of rebuilding. My personal opinion is that as soon as we have cited sources saying 'the ride is being rebuilt', that it should probably stay as is. OwainDavies (about)(talk) edited at 05:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Categories: WikiProject Kent articles | Stub-Class Kent-related articles | Low-importance Kent-related articles | Stub-Class Low-importance Kent-related articles | Kent rated articles with no comments | Stub-Class roller coaster articles | Mid-importance roller coaster articles | WikiProject Roller Coasters articles and lists