Talk:Scenic Railway (Dreamland)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Kent WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the county of Kent in South East England.
If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.)
Low This article is on a subject of low-importance for Kent-related articles.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.


This article is part of WikiProject Roller Coasters, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Roller coasters. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Status

I have changed the status from 'Destroyed' to 'SBNO'. Sections of the ride have been destroyed, other elements have been damaged by the fire. A large portion of the ride remains standing, therefore I don't think 'Destroyed' is appropriate. Feel free to discuss if you disagree. PMBO (talk) 23:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Having read the SBNO definition, it doesn't really seem to fit. I think 'Partially Destroyed' may be more appropriate? OwainDavies (about)(talk) edited at 16:12, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


I think this article should be redone when i type in scenic railway it should come up with the australian one it is older and has a world record.

[edit] past tense?

The article describes the scenic railway in the past tense, but given it is only 1/3rd destroyed isn't it premature to write it off? Pgr94 (talk) 10:16, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

As above, I think with the ride partially destroyed, the tense is probably past until some evidence is shown of rebuilding. My personal opinion is that as soon as we have cited sources saying 'the ride is being rebuilt', that it should probably stay as is. OwainDavies (about)(talk) edited at 05:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)