From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Image:Dumbledore.jpg |
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Harry Potter, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter universe. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
For more information and how you can help, click Show →
- Merge articles that we have agreed to merge at Notability
- Work on pages in our improvement drive to bring them to GA or FA status
- Remove original research from every article that has it
- Check the to do list for the Harry Potter article to help get it to FA
- Improve plot sections in accordance with WP:WAF
- Perform some much-needed work on fair use images
- Help expand content at the Muggles' Guide
- Expand factual subsections of HP book pages (such as editions and translations)
- Help the article Horcrux
- Add critical reviews to all book pages
|
Should this be merged with Peter Pettigrew, since they are the same character and that fact is apparent on either page when you read it. (Discuss) Sandpiper 09:43, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
I agree. - jerdwyer 21 December 2005
- I agree as well, they are the same person, it is redundant to have two articles. Cyclone49 09:26, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
Three months is surely long enough for dissenters to voice their opinions: done, therefore. Telsa (talk) 17:39, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
I wasn't around when this discussion took place. I disagree. Having a redirect link from Scabbers to Peter is a very big giveaway; it should not be said that Scabbers is Peter until within a Spoiled section. -- Jokes Free4Me 11:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)