User talk:Savvyconsumer7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Savvyconsumer7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 22:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Alan Keyes.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Alan Keyes.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on United States presidential election, 2008. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. V-train (talk) 11:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

It goes without saying, but I've blocked you for 31 hours for completely unacceptable edit warring. Cowman109Talk 19:43, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the civil e-mail; most people would yell quite a lot. Since it's clear to me you understand what went wrong (and it does appear that Mitrebox was using some sort of bot to revert your edits instantly) and stopped after you learned of the three-revert-rule I've unblocked you. If some sort of edit war begins to occur again, usually the best bet is to seek out other users (usually uninvolved ones) to look at the situation before it becomes so heated. And then an administrator would be the one to find if it is already out of hand to either protect the page or block the main users involved/instigator. Cowman109Talk 20:32, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] == Invitation to discussion about possible COI of editors ==

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:United_States_presidential_election%2C_2008#Possible_COI_of_two_editors --70.11.142.4 (talk) 04:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Keyes

I've replied to your comment at the Alan Keyes discussion page. JBFrenchhorn (talk) 19:27, 23 May 2008 (UTC)